30th September | | |
Whinges about Virgin holidays advert and 'responsible drinking'
| From asa.org.uk
|
A poster for Virgin Holidays at a London underground station showed four rockstars drinking champagne in a jacuzzi. There were a number of empty bottles and glasses lying by the jacuzzi. One of the rockstars and a female staff member were pouring
champagne into the jacuzzi. The text stated ROCKSTAR SERVICE. Book a stunning Hip Hotel in one of the world's most incredible destinations and Virgin Holidays' unique Travel Guru service will ensure your every desire is met . The
complainant objected to the way alcohol was portrayed in the ad, because they believed it promoted the misuse of alcohol. ASA Assessment: Upheld The ASA understood that Virgin's intention was to emphasise
the extent and level of service provided by the Travel Guru service. However, we noted that rockstars were widely accepted as glamorous and exciting figures, and that the ad depicted these rockstars in a scene that featured alcohol prominently. We
noted that the four rockstars in the ad were drinking in a party scene, with one rockstar holding two glasses of champagne at once, one pouring a bottle into the jacuzzi, and another tipping a glass back behind his head, which clearly implied that they
had also been drinking the champagne. As well as the two bottles being poured into the jacuzzi, the ad featured five empty bottles and two other glasses lying beside the jacuzzi. While we understood this could be interpreted as empty bottles left from
filling the jacuzzi, we considered that the number of bottles in the scene, with some tipped over and with roughly torn labels, and a character with more than one glass in his hand, indicated a casual attitude towards the handling and consumption of
alcohol. We concluded that the scene depicted in the ad, and actions of the glamorous characters in it, was likely to appeal to people under 18 years of age and encourage people to adopt styles of drinking that were unwise.
|
30th September | | |
Australian nutter MP is caught with 200,000 hits on porn websites
| 2nd September 2010. From samesame.com.au |
Australia's nutter MP, Fred Nile, is red-faced after Parliament's IT audit suggests he checked porn sites – clicking them up to 200,000 times. The Daily Telegraph has the scoop, but Nile today claims his staff were using his log-in to conduct
research purposes. Particularly researching the Sex Party according to his staff. The Christian Democrat adds that a huge 200,000 hit-count on the suspect' NSFW sites is surely impossible. Nile is holding on, though another
NSW politician's career is over after he was similarly discovered having accessed porn at work. Ports Minister Paul McLeay resigned following his net history revelation. In a teary media conference, McLeay said he had apologised to the Premier.
The audit, by the Department of Parliamentary Services, is understood to have found more than 60,000 suspect hits on McLeay's log-on. I am quite embarrassed to be standing here before you. This behaviour is not the standard expected of Government
ministers, he said. A firewall was installed in July for Legislative Assembly MPs so they could not view pornography, but Legislative Council President Amanda Fazio elected not to install a firewall for the Upper House. Before news of McLeay's
resignation broke, Ms Fazio yesterday said she was refusing to implement a similar ban in the Upper House saying she was against internet censorship . She said MPs should be able to research pornography. Nile's comeuppance follows a long
line of attacks against LGBT communities from from the early 80s right up to this week. Wading unhelpfully into the NSW debate on same-sex couples adopting children, he bizarrely claimed at a rally on Tuesday that some women would abort their children
rather than risk them being raised by gay couples. The Bible-thumper's hatred towards homosexuality is well-documented through his long political career. He used to frequently state that being gay was an "immoral and unnatural
lifestyle choice" and described Mardi Gras as a "public parade of immorality and blasphemy." He has labels his Green Party rivals as "anti-family." Update:
Crap filter definitions make for false accusations 4th September. From news.com.au An audit of politicians' internet use that claimed the scalp of a state minister ranked the newspaper site
news.com.au as the most visited adult website . The audit supposedly showed whether NSW MPs had been visiting adult links such as gambling and pornography sites. However Legislative Council president Amanda Fazio yesterday revealed the
audit had incorrectly classified news sites as adult because they contained links to or advertisements for adult dating sites. Both news.com.au and smh.com.au (Sydney Morning Herald) were classified as adult sites in the audit. The
definition of what has been classed as an adult site is something we're reviewing, she said: What surprised us... the biggest (site) of what is classed as an adult site being hit by the parliament is the news.com.au site. Because there are adult
matchmaking links or ads on their site, every time someone accesses news.com.au and they go from one article to another, that's counted as an individual hit on an adult site. The bungle is one of the most embarrassing examples to date of the
problems that can occur when governments and organisations try to regulate internet use. The revelation could also absolve some MPs tangled in the web porn scandal at NSW parliamentary offices that erupted this week. Opposition Leader Barry
O'Farrell said every politician had been tainted by the scandal and asked for the matter to be settled quickly. Update: Democratically elected representatives have to ask
permission to access more adult areas of the internet such as news websites 6th September. Based on
article from sify.com
Politicians at New South Wales Parliament House will now be able to access porn sites (including mainstream news sites with links to porn sites) with prior permission and only if it's for research . Upper House President Amanda Fazio has
reviewed the policies over Internet use. The new guidelines will allow staffers to seek an exemption to view adult sites if they need to research, reports the Daily Telegraph. Fazio said a memo will be issued to MPs this week of the new
arrangements, with the permission slip already available on the parliament intranet. Update: Parliamentary (Dis)Services 7th September. Based on
article from smh.com.au
The parliamentary staff member who commissioned an unauthorised audit of internet use which forced the sudden resignation of a minister last week has herself resigned. Lisa Vineburg, a human resources executive in the NSW Department of
Parliamentary (Dis)Services, left her position after it emerged she had asked the IT department to trawl through the computers of all ministers and MPs, their staffers and all non-political employees. The raw data, which suggested about five
people had recorded an usually high level of activity or hits from adult or gaming websites, was subsequently leaked to the media. Ms Vineburg took it upon herself to audit everyone in the building , a senior parliamentary source
said. Update: Government inquiry finds crap internet filter definitions 30th September 2010. From
aolnews.com
A state government investigation into Internet use among Australian politicians has been revealed as an embarrassing bungle after mainstream news websites were classified as adult sites. The audit, conducted by the Australian state government of
New South Wales, labeled Fred Nile, president of Australia's right-wing Christian Democratic Party, as one of the most prolific visitors to adult websites in the Aussie parliament. Paul McLeay, the minister for the state's ports and waterways,
resigned after admitting he looked at adult and gambling websites on his parliamentary computer. However, further investigation revealed that McLeay -- guilt aside -- possibly resigned prematurely, while Nile probably was using the Internet for
research purposes. Analysis of the audit left investigators red-faced when it was discovered that mainstream news websites had been classified as adult because of advertisements or links to matchmaking and dating sites. The
definition of what has been classed as an adult site is something we're reviewing, said Amanda Fazio, president of the New South Wales state Legislative Counci. Critics of the hotly debated Australian proposal believe the latest episode
demonstrates exactly why Web censorship is unworkable. The [Australian government] audit shows how a system that automatically classifies Web pages is going to be flawed, Colin Jacobs, of the Internet civil liberties lobby group Electronic
Frontiers Australia, told AOL News.
|
30th September | |
| Unelected council officers censor criticism by elected councilors
| Based on
article from
examiner.co.uk
|
A councillor has accused unelected officers of censoring him. Kirklees Council has refused to put Clr Martyn Bolt's annual report on its website – because it includes criticism of the council and a former MP. Instead officers have presented
a watered-down version for publication. The Kirklees report is radically different to the original, with phrases like debacle replaced by saga . Clr Bolt said yesterday he would not sign-off the censored report: Their version
doesn't read like something I would write. I'm a forthright Yorkshireman who calls a spade a spade. The deputy Conservative leader added he was concerned that unelected officers were telling him what to say. He said: In some cases I
think officers forget how a council should be run. Councillors need to stick up for themselves and point out that we actually put our names forward for re-election every four years. If more councillors did that, Kirklees would be more democratic.
Clr Bolt criticised the way Kirklees is run. His report says monthly council meetings are of questionable value given the power of the ruling Labour Cabinet. But the censored version includes a line added by officers which describes the monthly
meetings as important and influential . Bolt uncut on the ability of councillors to hold the Cabinet to account: I have continued to play a leading role in council meetings, though many were of
questionable value as the 'partnership' between other parties gives them a majority in council and Cabinet has no effective means of challenge. The official version: I have continued to play a
leading role in council meetings, though the power of the council remains limited and the majority of decisions are made by the council's Cabinet. Having said that, full council remains an important and influential arena which can have an impact.
Bolt uncut on the Government's decision to overturn the council's plan to close Castle Hall: The conclusion of the debacle was very pleasing as the entrenched position of Kirklees Cabinet and their supporters was
overthrown by an independent adjudicator. The official version: The saga has had a positive conclusion in regard to our two secondary schools, despite proposals to close one of them.
|
30th September | | |
Australia bans TV euthanasia advert
| 14th September 2010. Based on article from
bbc.co.uk
|
Australia has outlawed a television advertisement in favour of euthanasia - the first in many years to challenge a legal ban on the practice. In the advert, a gaunt-looking actor speaks of intolerable suffering and urges the government to listen
to those who wanted to die with dignity. The group behind the campaign, Exit International, told the BBC it would fight for its reinstatement. In the banned advertisement, an actor plays a man reflecting on his life and of being struck down
by a terminal illness, while pleading to be allowed to die with dignity: I chose to marry Tina, have two great kids. I chose to always drive a Ford. What I didn't choose was being terminally ill. I didn't choose to starve to
death because eating is like swallowing razor blades. And I certainly didn't choose to have to watch my family go through it with me. I've made my final choice. I just need the government to listen. Permission for the advert to be broadcast
has been withdrawn by censors on the grounds that it promotes suicide. Dr Philip Nitschke, the director of lobby group Exit International, says it is time to restart the debate with a new generation of Australians.
Update: Canada bans TV euthanasia advert 30th September 2010.From torontosun.com
A controversial pro-euthanasia ad has been banned from Canadian airwaves, and the group behind it is facing roadblocks at every corner of its Canadian speaking tour, where it instructs people on how to commit suicide painlessly. Exit
International's ad, which is available online, features a gaunt-looking man sitting at the edge of a bed. I chose to marry Tina, have two great kids. I chose to always drive a Ford, says the actor in the commercial. What I didn't choose is
being terminally ill. I didn't choose to starve to death because eating is like swallowing razor blades. I certainly didn't choose to have to watch my family go through it with me. I've made my final choice. I just need the government to listen.
Exit took the ad to Canada to promote its Canadian speaking tour, but the Television Bureau of Canada also banned it for contravening Canadian law, which does not permit assisted suicide. There's always some opposition, he says. Our
line is that the provision of good information allows people to make free choices. Dr. Philip Nitschke, the Australian physician behind Exit International will tour Canada starting in Vancouver on Oct. 7, and continues in Toronto on Oct. 13.
But he's already run into obstacles. The Toronto Public Library cancelled his Oct. 13. appearance, and he's speaking at a Unitarian Church instead. Last fall, the Vancouver Public Library banned an appearance. Update:
New Zealand accepts TV euthanasia advert Based on article from
stuff.co.nz
An advertisement advocating voluntary euthanasia that was banned from Australian screens is likely to air in New Zealand. The script for the ad from Exit International was approved by the Commercial Approvals Bureau this week. Exit
International director Dr Philip Nitschke is hopeful the initial positive response means the full ad will also be approved for screening: However, the same thing happened initially in Australia and then the ad was pulled 24 hours before it was due to
screen. Hopefully the same thing doesn't happen in New Zealand. Commercial Approvals Bureau director Rob Hoar said he didn't understand the Australian's reasoning: We had no problems with the script. It would probably have to been screen
during adult's viewing time because it deals with adult issues, but initially there are no problems with it.
|
29th September | | |
'Ref needs glasses' advert cleared by the ASA
| From asa.org.uk
|
An online sales promotion for Asda opticians stated, Our special World Cup offer: Free eye tests for all Uruguayans Like everyone in England, we couldn't believe our eyes when the Uruguayan referee and linesman failed to recognise Frank Lampard's
equalising goal against Germany. We're responding by offering all Uruguayans a free eye test to avoid anything like this happeneing [sic] again. All you have to do is bring your passport into any Asda opticians ... Optical buying manager Nik
Langrish-Dixon says: 'Let's face it - it could have been a very different game had the disallowed goal been counted. After the linesman's slip-up our expert opticians are concerned about the state of his Urug-eyes, so we're offering anyone with a Uruguay
passport a free eye test' ... . The complainant, a British-Uruguayan, objected that the ad was offensive. ASA Assessment: Not upheld We understood that the promotion was intended to be
light-hearted and humorous, exploiting the controversy resulting from the Germany and England World Cup game. In that context, while we acknowledged the attempt at humour might be distasteful to some, we considered that most readers of the ad would
interpret it as football banter rather than malice towards Uruguayans. Because of that, we concluded that the ad was unlikely to cause serious or widespread offence.
|
29th September | | |
Book banners at the Kuwait book fair
| |
Kuwait's information ministry dismissed criticism from liberal MPs for banning books from a fair due next month while Islamists praised the move. The ministry said in a statement that its censorship committee has banned only 25 titles out of
24,000 books for abusing God, prophets and other religious figures, books on pornography and others undermining Kuwait. It provided no other details on the books or the authors banned from displaying their works at the book fair which will run
from October 13 to 23. Liberal MPs and civil society groups charged that the government was attempting to stiffle freedom of speech and thought. Barring books from the Kuwait book fair is a breach of the constitution, which does not
apply restrictions on the freedom of speech, liberal MP Saleh al-Mulla said in a statement. But Islamist MPs praised the measure saying it is obligatory for the information ministry to ban books that abuse God and other religious figures.
Banning books that abuse God, prophets and Kuwait is mandatory for the government and it will be held accountable if it fails to do so, Salafi Islamist MP Waleed al-Tabtabai said in a statement. The ministry's statement came as several
Kuwaiti and Egyptian newspapers carried reports in recent days saying that works by prominent Egyptian authors have been banned from the Kuwait book fair. Among those banned were books by Alaa al-Aswany, author of the acclaimed novel The
Yacoubian Building which has been translated into several languages and made into a film. Books by author Gamal al-Gitani, regarded as the best student of the late Naguib Mahfouz, who won the 1988 Nobel Prize for Literature, have also been banned.
|
29th September | | |
Malaysian political cartoonist arrested on sedition charges
| Based on article from
cpj.org
|
The Committee to Protect Journalists condemns the arrest of Malaysian cartoonist Zulkifli Awar Ulhaque, also known as Zunar, a contributor to the popular news site Malaysiakini and author of a new collection of political cartoons. Police raided
Zunar's Kuala Lumpur office and arrested him under the Sedition Act, just before the scheduled release of his new book, Cartoon-O-Phobia . He was released on bail on Saturday, according to local news reports. Sedition charges in
Malaysia are often used to suppress press criticism and carry possible three-year jail terms for first-time offenders, according to CPJ research. Zunar's drawings often tackle sensitive issues, including the ongoing sodomy trial of opposition
leader Anwar Ibrahim and the perceived influence of Prime Minister Najib Razak's wife over his decision-making. Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussein said the arrest was related to cartoons that touched on the legal system and religion, the state
news agency Bernama reported. We call on Malaysian authorities to stop harassing political cartoonist Zunar and to drop all charges against him, said Shawn W. Crispin, CPJ's senior Southeast Asia representative: The arrest of a
cartoonist is inconsistent with Prime Minister Najib's vow on taking office that he would uphold, not suppress, press freedom. Update: Freed but books still banned 13th October 2011.See
article from online.wsj.com Zulkiflee Anwar
Ulhaque, better-known among comic fans as Zunar is one of the few satirists willing to take open shots against the country's ruling establishment, and in September 2010, police arrested him on a sedition charge just hours before the launch party for a
new book of cartoons poking fun at the aristocratic, British-educated Prime Minister Najib Razak, among other topics. Government officials said Zulkiflee's cartoons violated Malaysia's Printing Presses and Publications Act, which regulates
newspapers, because he didn't have a license to publish. He was later released without charge, but not without sneaking out a cartoon or two from behind bars. His books, though, remain banned. Update: Can I have my
books back? 27th January 2012. See article from
indexoncensorship.org Political cartoonist Zunar (Zulkifli Anwar Ulhaque) has appeared at the Kuala Lumpur High Court for the first hearing of a civil suit in which he
challenges the Malaysian government and police for his arrest and detention on 24 September 2010. Zunar is seeking the return of confiscated property as well as aggravated losses and damages incurred in the raid of his office, during which police
seized copies of his latest work, Cartoon-O-Phobia, and arrested him for sedition. The raid occurred just hours before the book's launch. Update: Books ordered returned 10th August 2012. From bikyamasr.com
A Malaysia court has ruled that the arrest and detention of popular and award-winning cartoonist Zulkiflee Anwar Ulhaqur, or Zunar, 2 years ago by police was lawful. The court, led by Judicial Commissioner Vazeer Alam Mydin Meera argued
that the government's seizure of 66 of his books and paintings was illegal. He ordered the books and the painting to be returned to the cartoonist. In his ruling, Vazeer said: The authorities had failed
to provide evidence to substantiate the seizure of the books, adding that the law did not allow for the materials to be kept for a long time. The continued confiscation of the books will affect the plaintiff's right to his
livelihood.
|
29th September | | |
Saudi ministry suggests that bloggers will have to register
| From arabnews.com
|
The Ministry of Culture & Information spokesman Abdul Rahman Al-Hazzaa did a quick volte-face after saying that bloggers and Web forums in Saudi Arabia would have to register themselves under a proposed new electronic media law. Earlier that
same morning, Al-Hazzaa told Al-Arabiya channel that electronic publishing would be included in the publication and printing bylaws applied in the Kingdom. He added that blogs and online forums would be included in this ruling. Approval has been given to
provide the ministry with the power to view any case related to blogs and online forums, he said, adding that online media would be treated the same as the print media. The remarks sparked a storm among Saudi online users, leading to a further
statement from Al-Hazzaa who said the new law would require online news sites to be licensed, but would only encourage bloggers and others to register. We do not want to license them. There are so many we cannot control them, he said of the
thousands of Saudi bloggers and online forum operators. He claimed that his remarks on Al-Arabiya had been taken out of context, but stressed it would not be compulsory to be registered. It's not required, no; it's not in the plan, he told AFP.
He said there were more than 100 news websites and that licensing them would permit their reporters to take part in regular media activities alongside the traditional media. In the interview, Al-Hazzaa had said that the new regulations
being finalized are mainly to give his department supervisory authority over electronic media, as it has over traditional print and broadcast media and publishing houses in Saudi Arabia.
|
28th September | | |
Ofcom clears abortion advert over claims that it was political
| Based on
article from digitalspy.co.uk
|
Ofcom has cleared the UK's first television advert for advice on abortion services after rejecting complaints about its political nature. Last month, the Advertising Standards Authority ASA dismissed over 4,000 complaints about an ad run
for sexual health charity Marie Stopes International (MSI). The ad featured three women who had missed their period, as a voiceover pointed them to MSI for pregnancy advice. Separately, media regulator Ofcom received 270 complaints about
the ad, with the majority claiming that its political nature was in breach of the broadcasting code. However, the watchdog ruled that the ad was not in breach of its guidelines as MSI is a not-for-profit organisation and so is permitted to
advertise on television: Ofcom does not consider that the content of the advertisement itself in any way sought to bring about changes in the law or influence the legislative proces. The
advertisement was the promotion of MSI as an organisation that gives post-conception advice and to encourage viewers who needed such advice to contact them.
|
28th September | | |
Artists to boycott Paris exhibition over Russian censorship
| |
Russian artists have threatened to boycott an exhibition of contemporary Russian art at the Louvre over the removal of works deemed offensive to Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, a gallery owner said. Seven artists have declared that they won't
participate in the exhibition in solidarity with Avdei Ter-Oganyan whose works were censured by the [Russian] culture ministry, prominent Moscow gallery owner Marat Guelman told AFP. The ban covers Ter-Oganyan's abstract works that include
sometimes provocative notes by the artist. One work, a black rectangle on a red background, bears the inscription: This work urges you to commit an attack on statesman V.V. Putin in order to end his statist and political activities. The
boycott of the exhibition at the Louvre opening next month will draw attention to this absurd conflict between art and the authorities. My works were created for this purpose and demonstrate the idiocy of idiots, Ter-Oganyan wrote on his website.
The Counterpoint: Russian Contemporary Art is scheduled to open at Paris' top museum on October 14 and run through January 31, 2011. Update: Russia Confirms
Censorship 30th September 2010. Russia has confirmed that it had blocked the export of paintings by a controversial contemporary artist due to be shown at the Louvre in Paris because they could incite extremism. The
abstract works by artist Avdei Ter-Oganyan could be seen as calls for a coup d'etat, or inciting national or religious hatred, deputy culture minister Andrei Busygin told the Interfax news agency. The series of works consist of geometric
patterns with provocative captions such as This work urges you to commit an attack on statesman V.V. Putin in order to end his state and political activities. Deputy culture minister Busygin told Interfax that it was debatable whether the
works were a joke or something that falls under the federal law on fighting extremism. The culture ministry and a federal arts watchdog expressed doubts about the advisability of exhibiting these works at the Louvre, he
said.
|
28th September | | |
OIC propose UN resolutions against Koran burning days and defamation of religion
| From christianpost.com
|
An Islamic organization that claims to represent the collective voice of the Muslim world is trying to get the U.N. Human Rights Council to pass a resolution condemning the highly-publicized and now-defunct plan of a U.S. preacher to burn Qurans.
In a draft resolution submitted by Pakistan, the 57 member states of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) expressed their concern over the instances of intolerance, discrimination, profiling and acts of violence against Muslims
occurring in many parts of the world. They also called upon the U.N. Human Rights Council to condemn any advocacy of religious hatred that constitutes incitement to hatred, discrimination, hostility or violence, and to call upon the
international community to stand together against acts that undermine peaceful coexistence between nations and create an environment conducive to violence and reprisal. Specifically, their resolution asks the council to speak out against the
recent call by an extremist group to organize a day to burn copies of Islam's sacred text, the Quran. Aside from the resolution on the planned Quran burnings, OIC is also trying to push through another resolution that it has brought before the
U.N. Human Rights Council every year over the past decade. The resolution, which OIC has annually sponsored since 1999, seeks to make the defamation of religions a human rights violation, saying that the defamation of religions, and
incitement to religious hatred in general, could lead to social disharmony and violations of human rights. [As per Pakistan]. It claims there is a need to effectively combat defamation of all religions and
incitement to religious hatred in general and against Islam and Muslims in particular. The OIC resolutions, together with others yet to be submitted at the council, are likely to be voted on when the council wraps up its current autumn session
at the end of next week. The council's 15th session, which commenced Sept. 13, concludes on Oct. 1.
|
27th September | | |
Daily Star censured by PCC over Rochdale squat loo story
| From dailystar.co.uk
|
Adam Sheppard complained to the Press Complaints Commission that an article headlined Muslim-only public loos , published in the Daily Star on 15 July 2010, was inaccurate and misleading in breach of Clause 1 (Accuracy) of the Editors' Code of
Practice. The complaint was upheld. The front-page article reported that a Rochdale shopping centre had installed Muslim-only squat-hole loos , and that the local council had wasted YOUR money on them. The complainant
said that it was inaccurate to say that the toilets were Muslim-only : the facilities, which were common to many countries, would be available to all. In addition, the decision to pay for the nile pans was taken by the shopping centre
itself, rather than the local council. It did not therefore involve taxpayers' money. The newspaper said that - while non-Muslims could have used the loos - they were designed with Muslims in mind. Nonetheless, it accepted that the headline was
inaccurate in that non-Muslims would be free to use the toilets. It also accepted that the loos were paid for by a private developer. Adjudication In this prominent story, there were two clear errors of
fact which, in the circumstances, would have misled readers in a significant manner: the toilets could not be described as Muslim only ; and were not paid for by the local council. While the newspaper had accepted that the article was wrong - and
offered to correct the item - the Commission was particularly concerned at the lack of care the newspaper had taken in its presentation of the story. This led to a breach of Clause 1 of the Code which makes clear that newspapers must take care not to
publish inaccurate, misleading or distorted information . The complaint was upheld.
|
27th September | | |
Indian film about honour killings runs foul of the film censors
| From timesofindia.indiatimes.com
|
A new Indian film, Aakrosh , which is based on honour killing, has got into trouble with the Central Board for Film Certification (CBFC). The board has issued a show-cause notice to the producer, demanding 30 cuts or changes in the dialogue
of the film. It is learnt that the film's producers may not agree to all the changes asked for by the examining committee and may appeal to the CBFC revising committee. Regional officer of CBFC, Alpana Sharma told TOI: We have issued a
show-cause notice asking the producer to delete some dialogue. The examining committee has objected to derogatory remarks made against the CBI, caste, community and women and has asked them to delete it. Another source said the film allegedly
has a lot of dialogue that has double meaning and remarks against women that are highly objectionable. An industry source confirmed that there is strong language in the film. The examining committee has asked the producer to either delete or replace
this language with milder words, said the industry source. The producer feels that the whole purpose of making a film on honour killing would be defeated if some of the dialogue is scrapped. Update:
Appeal 5th October 2010. From bollywoodhungama.com The film has been granted an A certificate with five cuts
by the Revising Committee, a drastic improvement from the initially asked for 30. With this new certificate, Aakrosh is all set to release on October 15.
|
26th September | | |
Military operation to prevent the sales of a book
| 12th September 2010. Based on
article from m.motherjones.com
|
Operation Dark Heart is the new book by former Defense Intelligence Agency officer and retired army reservist Anthony Shaffer It sounds like an interesting read with the tagline: spycraft and special ops on the frontlines of
Afghanistan and the path to victory but now the Pentagon does want to let people get a look at what's inside. The book was originally cleared by army reviewers, who vetted the manuscript to ensure it didn't reveal national security secrets. It
went to press, was sent to reviewers, and was even available for a short time online. But now the Pentagon is now negotiating with Shaffer's publisher to purchase all 10,000 copies of the first print run with the intention of destroying them. It
turns out the book may indeed contain a significant amount of senstive material. Once the DIA looked over the book, and shared it with other intelligence agencies, 200 passages suspected of containing classified information were discovered setting off a scramble by Pentagon officials to stop the book's distribution,
according to the Times. The classified portions of Shaffer's book, according to the Times, include the names of American intelligence officers who served with Colonel Shaffer and his accounts of clandestine operations, including N.S.A.
eavesdropping operations. Fox is reporting that intelligence officials are also trying to deep-six portions of the book concerning a classified data mining program known as Able Danger. Update:
Nameless Censorship 18th September 2010. A publisher has agreed to remove US intelligence details from a memoir by a former army officer in Afghanistan after the Pentagon raised last-minute
objections, officials said. The book, Operation Dark Heart , had been printed and prepared for release in August but St. Martin's Press will now issue a revised version of the spy memoir after negotiations with the Pentagon, US and
company officials said. In an unusual step, the Defense Department has agreed to reimburse the company for the cost of the first printing, spokesman Colonel Dave Lapan told AFP. The original manuscript contained classified information which had
not been properly reviewed by the military and US spy agencies, he said. St. Martin's press will destroy copies from the first printing with Pentagon representatives observing to ensure it's done in accordance with our standards, Lapan
said. The second, revised edition would be ready by the end of next week, said the author's lawyer, Mark Zaid. Update: Books Burnt 26th September 2010. Based
on article from us.cnn.com In a statement to CNN, Pentagon spokeswoman
Lt. Col. April Cunningham said defense officials observed the September 20 destruction of about 9,500 copies of Army Reserve Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer's new memoir Operation Dark Heart. Shaffer says he was notified Friday about the
Pentagon's purchase: The whole premise smacks of retaliation, Shaffer told CNN on Saturday. Someone buying 10,000 books to suppress a story in this digital age is ludicrous. Shaffer's publisher, St. Martin's Press, released a second
printing of the book that it said had incorporated some changes the government had sought while redacting other text he (Shaffer) was told was classified. From single words and names to entire paragraphs, blacked out lines appear throughout
the book's 299 pages.
|
26th September | | |
US Nintendo censors cover art cleavage
| Based on article
from destructoid.com
|
The Nintendo Wii game Samurai Warriors 3 is being released in the USA very soon, but not in its original form. It has been noticed that Nintendo of America edited out a little bit of cleavage on the game's box art!
This is perhaps the most pointless and ludicrous edit I've ever seen. The European box art shows some significant cleavage on one of the characters, while the North American version features ... a little bit less cleavage. You still see cleavage, but
just a bit less. And this achieves ... what, exactly? |
26th September | | |
Brighton and Hove Council censors criticism by claiming copyright on council meeting videos
| From jim.killock.org.uk
|
A Brighton And Hove Green Party councillor, Jason Kitcat, is being disciplined for posting clips of Brighton & Hove Council meetings to Youtube. The clips are claimed as a political use of Council resources . Their
documents say Jason attempted to hold the administration politically to account by trying to highlight what the he believed were the administration's deficiencies , while using the council's intellectual property and website. Rather
than concluding he was doing his job, they say Jason should face being suspended from his post. The Council claim the web clips are resources which belong to the Council. They assert Jason must therefore abide by the Council's code of
conduct, which: specifically prohibits the use of resources (such as IT equipment) improperly for political purposes, including party political purposes These rules are designed to stop unfair use of telephones and offices to campaign for
re-election, for instance. The rules are not meant to be applied to matters of free speech, with no impact on council finances, using tools that are freely available to everyone. Jason has, in copyright law, a fair dealing right to use clips to
report news. Fair dealing is meant to stop copyright interfering with free speech, by placing a limit on intellectual property . Whether Jason's use of the material is fair dealing can only be decided in a Court. If Jason is
held to have abused council property , Councillors will be intimidated from using information to tell residents what is going on. The same information, in words, is reported in minutes and placed in political leaflets. Will Brighton
Councillors stop such reporting, as the same copyright subsists in Council minutes?
|
26th September | | |
Singapore censorship review committee proposes less restrictions on R21 films
| 15th September 2010. From straitstimes.com |
R21 films may soon make their way to local cinemas as well as DVDs and pay TV, if recommendations by the Censorship Review Committee (CRC) are accepted by the Government. The CRC report called for relaxation in content and regulation standards,
given that technological changes are undermining the old ways of restricting content. With more content streaming through the Internet, the existing media regulations will become less effective. Responsibility must shift to individuals and parents, who
must be empowered to make choices for themselves and for their children. The panel, a state-appointed group of 17 people, was convened to review current censorship regulations across media such as films, videos and publications, as well as the
arts. It is chaired by Goh Yew Lin, chairman of the Yong Siew Toh Conservatory. In a bold suggestion that may raise eyebrows, the panel wants R21 content to be made available on more platforms - at home and in local cinemas, the panel has
recommended that videos may be sold in video stores, provided the industry can enforce the restriction of sale to minors. It also suggests that R21 content be available on subscription TV and video-on-demand with a default parental lock. Making a case for easing of R21 content, the committee's report said:
Where consumers have the ability to exercise controlled choice, as is the case with video-on-demand, R21 content should be permitted. However, its introduction should be carefully calibrated, and only allowed if there are adequate safeguards in place
to prevent access by minors . The commitee also recommended that a new PG13 rating be introduced to 'provide a stronger signal to parents on the nature of the content and to facilitate appropriate rating of films with some mature
content. The CRC has submitted its report to Ministry of Information, Communications and the Arts, which is expected to respond in a month's time. Update: Fitting in Dark
Knight 26th September 2010. From filmbiz.asia , thanks to Sean
Singapore's Censorship Review Committee is recommending that the country become slightly less buttoned up and that content regulation become more pragmatic. The committee, which spent nearly a year deliberating, recommends the introduction of
a new PG-13 film classification. Explaining the idea of a PG-13 category Vijay Chandra, chairman of the Films Consultative Panel, said that The Dark Knight was rated PG, meaning that even primary school age children could watch it, although
its violence may have upset parents. However, he said that an NC-16 rating would have been unwarranted. As a consequence of the result of a PG-13 rating being introduced, Chandra said that the average PG film would then become milder and more
innocuous. In total the committee made some 80 recommendations – including dropping the word censorship from the title of future review committees – to the Ministry of Information, Communications and the Arts. The ministry is expected to
respond within a month.
|
25th September | | |
Authorities seem unable to differentiate an obviously jokey tweet from a real threat
| One has to wonder if the reported increase in a threat from Ireland is down to couple of jokey tweets. Based on
article from guardian.co.uk
|
Paul Chambers, a 27-year old trainee accountant from South Yorkshire, has launched a fightback against what is thought to be the UK's first criminal conviction for the content of a tweet on the microblogging site. He landed a £1,000 fine
after the snow closed Robin Hood airport near Doncaster in January as he planned a trip to see Crazycolours, a Northern Irish girl he had just met online, and he tweeted to his 690 followers: Crap! Robin Hood airport is closed. You've got a
week and a bit to get your shit together otherwise I'm blowing the airport sky high!! A week later, he was arrested at work by five police officers, questioned for eight hours, had his computers and phones seized and was subsequently charged
and convicted of causing a menace under the Communications Act 2003. In an appeal at Doncaster crown court, his barrister, Stephen Ferguson, said Chambers had been merely engaging in banter and craic and that far from having menacing
intent, his message was a jest, a joke, a parody . The defence applied to the judge to rule out the prosecution case that the tweet was menacing on the grounds it had not been sufficiently proved and there was no intent on Chambers'
part to cause menace. Throughout proceedings, Chambers sat largely expressionless behind toughened glass panels with a security guard beside him, only wincing slightly at the the continual repetition of his offending tweet. He nodded when Ferguson told
the judge simply: The intention was innocent. Fresh evidence emerged which was not heard at the previous trial that the police noted after Chambers was bailed there is no evidence at this stage this is anything other than a foolish
comment posted on Twitter for only his close friends to see . But the crown said the conviction should stand and presented evidence that Chambers had sent direct messages to his girlfriend apparently on the terrorist theme. The court earlier
heard that a senior airport official had determined [the message] was a non-credible threat after it had been found by Sean Duffield, an off-duty airport duty manager searching on-line at home. Under cross-examination, Duffield, said the impact
after he found Chambers' message was operationally nothing. It had no impact. Chambers was not cross-examined, but the court heard extracts of his original police interview. Looking back it's daft now but that's my kind of humour, Chambers had said.
Not for one second did I think anyone would even look at it. It was just a comment made on the back of the fact that the flight had been grounded. The tweet, Stephen Ferguson pointed out, was made in the context of a young man and a young woman
. The judge and magistrates retired to consider their ruling and said the case would conclude a later date.
|
25th September | | |
ASA offended by newspaper phone sex advert
| From asa.org.uk
|
A regional press ad, for an adult chatline, stated LIVE CHAT GRANNIES and featured a phone number and the picture of a naked woman, with stars covering her nipples, who had her hand between her legs. A reader challenged whether the ad was
offensive and unsuitable for a free newspaper, where it might be seen by children. ASA Assessment: Upheld We noted the Advertisers argument that the ad had been accepted in error and welcomed their
assurance that it would not be used again. However, we noted the ad appeared in a free newspaper, which was available for anyone to pick up, including children. Although we noted the ad appeared in the Personal section of the paper, we nonetheless
considered that the image of a naked woman in a provocative pose with her hand between her legs, was overtly sexual in nature and unsuitable for an untargeted medium that could be seen by children. We therefore considered that the ad was likely to cause
serious offence to some readers, and concluded that it was in breach of the Code. The ad breached CAP Code clauses 2.2 (Social responsibility) and 5.1 (Decency).
|
25th September | | |
Iran plans to create another book censor
| Based on article from
rferl.org
|
Iranian Culture Minister Mohammad Hosseini has announced plans to create a new five-person board that will approve the content of all books prior to publication, RFE/RL's Radio Farda reports. Hosseini said that the new board would be similar to
Iran's Press Supervisory Board, and its members would decide which books can be published. The five board members will be appointed by the Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution. Faraj Sarkouhi, a prominent writer and journalist living
in exile, told RFE/RL that it appears that the five members of the new board are going to be in charge of supervising book censorship. He added that censorship by the Culture Ministry, without whose approval nothing is published in Iran, had no
legal basis. Even according to the laws of the Islamic republic, censorship is illegal, he said. The Office to Examine Books, which is subordinate to the Culture Ministry, was responsible for censoring books, Sarkouhi said, but with the
establishment of the five-member board, another institution, too, will be in charge of censorship in Iran.
|
24th September | | |
Men of the AntiPornMenProject join the women of the AntiMenProject
| Thanks to Mike From morningstaronline.co.uk
|
Matt McCormack Evans, co-founder of the Anti Porn Men Project, said that the campaign aimed to raise awareness of the harms of pornography and encourage more men to speak out against it: Coming at a time when the UK feminist movement is experiencing a
resurgence, the project is unique in its targeting of men . Between 2000 and 2006 the number of men in Britain using internet porn increased by more than 400% to around 40% of the entire male population, according to the group. But
picking a fight with an industry estimated to be worth around £63 billion worldwide is not an easy task. A new generation is being raised on porn - an industry whose product is overwhelmingly violent and degrading towards women, said
McCormack Evans, who is just 22: This must be seen in the context of our society where one in five teenage girls have been hit by a boyfriend. To date, there has been little room for men to speak out against pornography. The Anti Porn Men Project is
here to change that.
|
24th September | | |
New Zealand TV censor has a whinge at Home and Away
| From 3news.co.nz
|
A raunchy and sexually charged scene on prime-time soap opera Home and Away breached broadcasting standards, the Broadcasting Standards Authority (BSA) has ruled. The BSA said the Home and Away episode, which aired on TV3 at 5:30pm
on March 24 with a General (G) classification, breached standards relating to responsible programming, children's interests, and good taste and decency. During the episode, two adult characters, Martha and Liam, began kissing and Liam removed
Martha's bathrobe, leaving her in a bra and pyjama pants. Liam then lay back on a table while Martha straddled him as they continued to kiss until another character walked in. TV3's broadcaster TVWorks said that the programme had screened in a
timeslot that was not considered to be predominately children's viewing time on the channel and that child viewers would not be alarmed or distressed by such scenes. The BSA disagreed, saying the programme was raunchy and sexually charged and went well beyond the level of sexual activity that should be included in a G-rated programme.
TV3 legal counsel Clare Bradley gave 3news.co.nz the following response today: TV3 is considering whether it will appeal the decision concerning content in Home and Away but there is no plan to change the time at which it screens
We don't agree that the material in this scene would alarm or distress children under the age of 14yrs who might view the programme. They would see two people in a friendly, affectionate embrace kissing and cuddling and then jumping apart in
embarrassment when they were interrupted by another member of the cast. Importantly there is no violence or threatening behaviour in the scene which might have the potential to be alarming or distressing for children. There was categorically no explicit
sexual activity nor was there any nudity.
|
24th September | | |
mediamarch rename themselves to safermedia
| Spotted by mediasnoops.wordpress.com
|
A few months ago the nutters of Mediamarch have re-named and re-jigged themselves and given themselves a new name: Safermedia. And they have got themselves a blog at safermedia.blogspot.com
They describe themselves as: safermedia (formerly known as mediamarch) is a voluntary group seeking to reduce the harmful effects of the media on our children, families and society. Our dream is to see
the media influencing people positively to create a safer and happier society for everyone
|
23rd September | | |
Remake of I Spit on Your Grave gets an unrated cinema release in the US
| From horroryearbook.com
|
Is unrated cinema becoming the new 3D? A gimmick to get horror fans' asses into theater seats? Anchor Bay is following in Hatchet II 's footsteps by releasing I Spit on Your Grave unrated in select theaters on October 7, 2010.
We are thrilled to be releasing the unrated, uncensored version of the new I Spit On Your Grave , says Bill Clark, President of Anchor Bay Entertainment: Steven R Monroe has brought his own remarkable vision to this cult classic and we
are certain that the unrated cut will, like the original, evoke a visceral reaction from audiences worldwide.
|
23rd September | |
| Australian Sex Party sets out their classification policies
| From sexparty.org.au
|
The Australian Sex Party have outlined their key polices re state media censorship: Key Policies: * To establish a national classification scheme that includes uniform ratings for
explicit adult material across all jurisdictions and through all media (including computer games, magazines and films) *To legalise the sale of and making of X rated films nationally
* To move away from privileging narrow moulds of sexual taste, acts and cultures to expressly include depictions of fetish (currently excluded from Australia's X rating) in a new rating category called Non Violent Erotica
* To actively promote the responsible enjoyment of erotica, endorsing positive messages about consensual and safe sexual activity, and condemning non-consensual sexual activity and sexual violence
*To develop a best practice model with recommendations for the ethical production of pornography that is rewarding and positive for the contributor *To provide training for all appointees of the Classification Board
and Classification Review Board in the latest developments around sexuality to bring them up to date with a pluralistic range of adult sexualities, subcultures, behaviours and body types * To introduce R, X and NVE
ratings for computer games
|
22nd September | | |
ATVOD now the point of contact for Video on Demand complaints
| Based on article
from digitalspy.com
|
Ofcom has officially handed responsibility for overseeing all video on-demand complaints to its co-censor, the Association For Television On-Demand (ATVOD). ATVOD, which took over promised light touch regulation duties from Ofcom in March,
will now respond to any complaints relating to editorial content on UK-based VOD services. Ofcom has tasked the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) with handling all advertising related issues, while ATVOD will deal with all matters pertaining
to consumer protection standards and guidelines for taste, decency and sponsorship requirements. Ruth Evans, former deputy chair of Ofcom's consumer panel, currently acts as ATVOD's independent chair on a five-strong board that includes former
Channel 4 News editor Sara Nathan, Advertising Association chief executive Tim Lefroy, ASA Council member Nigel Walmsley and broadcasting censorship specialist Ian McBride. Sky's Daniel Austin, BT's Simon Milner, Virgin Media's Simon Hunt and
Five's Chris Loweth will provide the ATVOD board with an industry perspective. The organisation has further hired Pete Johnson as its chief executive, after he previously managed VOD and censorship policy for the BBFC. The material to be
regulated, though, does not include all internet video. The rules apply only to television-like services delivered on demand, not to user-generated videos such as those that appear on YouTube. Material qualifies for regulation if it is similar in
form and content to television programmes; if it has a person who is editorially responsible for it; is based in the UK; and is available on an on-demand basis. The material that does fall under ATVOD's regulation must conform to some of the
standards expected of broadcast television. It must not incite racial hatred; harm under-18s; or break rules on sponsorship or product placement, ATVOD's rules say.
|
22nd September | | |
Google shows counts of government requests to block or takedown data
| From bits.blogs.nytimes.com
|
Google has lately found itself on the receiving end of criticism from privacy and transparency advocates. But with two new tools, Google is trying to convince them that the company is on their side. Google has introduced a new tool called the
Transparency Report. It publishes where and when Internet traffic to Google sites is blocked, and the blockages are annotated with details when possible. For instance, the tool shows that YouTube has been blocked in Iran since the disputed presidential
election in June 2009. The Transparency Report will also be the home for Google's government requests tool, a map that shows every time a government has asked Google to take down or hand over information, and what percentage of the time Google has
complied. Google introduced it in April and updates it every six months. Government requests could be court orders to remove hateful content or a subpoena to pass along information about a Google user. The transparency project was the brainchild
of engineers during their 20 percent time, the time that Google allots for people to work on their own projects. Google Explains See
Transparency Report from google.com Transparency is a core value at Google. As a company
we feel it is our responsibility to ensure that we maximize transparency around the flow of information related to our tools and services. We believe that more information means more choice, more freedom and ultimately more power for the individual.
We've created an interactive map of Government Requests that shows the number of government inquiries for information about users and requests for Google to take down or censor content. We hope this step toward greater transparency will help in
ongoing discussions about the appropriate scope and authority of government requests. Our interactive Traffic graphs provide information about traffic to Google services around the world. Each graph shows historic traffic patterns for a given
country/region and service. By illustrating outages, this tool visualizes disruptions in the free flow of information, whether it's a government blocking information or a cable being cut. We hope this raw data will help facilitate studies about service
outages and disruptions. UK censorship requests Interesting to see that the UK is predictably high up the list of state censors. Second to none in terns of data requests and only behind Brazil and Libya
in terms of blocking requests 1343 data requests. 48 removal requests, for a total of 232 items 62.5% of removal requests fully or partially complied with.
- Blogger
- 1 court orders to remove content
- 1 items requested to be removed
- Video
- 3 court orders to remove content
- 32 items requested to be removed
- Groups
- 1 court orders to remove content
- 1 items requested to be removed
- Web Search
- 8 court orders to remove content
- 144 items requested to be removed
- YouTube
- 6 court orders to remove content
- 29 non-court order requests to remove content
- 54 items requested
to be removed
|
22nd September | | |
New Zealand TV censor has a whinge at TV drama, Hung
| From voxy.co.nz
|
A scene implicitly depicting oral sex and genital nudity in an episode of Hung shown on TV One breached the good taste and decency standard, a majority of the Broadcasting Standards Authority has found. Hung is a comedy-drama series
about a divorced and financially struggling father, Ray Drecker, who starts working as a male prostitute. In the episode broadcast on TV One at 9.50pm on Monday 22 March, Ray went on a date with a woman called Lenore. At
approximately 10.10pm Ray was shown lifting up Lenore's skirt and removing her underwear. One brief shot of Lenore's genital area was shown in the scene, which was shot at a short distance in front of her. Lenore then sat down on a couch and
placed her legs over Ray's shoulders. Ray crouched with his head between Lenore's legs and performed oral sex. Lenore's legs and torso were visible as Lenore writhed and moaned on the couch. The top half of Lenore's body was fully clothed and her genital
area was obscured by Ray's head. A formal complaint was made to Television New Zealand that the scene amounted to soft porn . In response TVNZ said that the programme had screened at 9.50pm, which was over an hour after the 8.30pm
Adults Only (AO) watershed, was classified AO, and was preceded by a written and verbal warning. The scene complained about had been relatively brief, not detailed, obviously acted and important in the context of the series, TVNZ said. In
its decision a majority of the BSA found that that although the context went some way to alerting viewers to the challenging nature of the programme, the content complained about went well beyond the level of sexual material that viewers would expect to
see on free-to-air television. In the majority's view, the scene complained about was prolonged, explicit and gratuitous, leaving nothing to the imagination and designed solely for the purpose of shocking and titillating the audience, the
decision said. In these circumstances factors such as the programme's AO classification and the use of a written and verbal warning were not sufficient to prevent the broadcast breaching standards of good taste and decency, the decision
said. The BSA did not make any orders, saying that publication of the decision would be sufficient to clarify its expectations surrounding sexual content of this nature.
|
21st September | | |
Oregon law prohibiting sexuality in young people's fiction overturned
| From statesmanjournal.com
|
Booksellers and sex educators have won an appeal against Oregon laws supposedly intended to keep adults from using pornography to groom young people for sex, but in fact cast so widely as to effectively prohibit references to sexuality in young people's
fiction. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned major portions of the 2007 laws, saying they could apply to standard sex education literature, books such as The Joy of Sex or books for children or young people by author Judy
Blume. State legislators supposedly tried to craft laws against adults using hardcore pornography to lower the inhibitions of young people, the court said. But, it said, the laws they wrote were too broad, and good intentions cannot trump the
language of the statute. Booksellers and groups such as Planned Parenthood, the Association of American Publishers and the American Civil Liberties Union challenged the laws, which a federal judge had upheld. This is an important
victory permitting readers — both younger and older — to obtain what they are constitutionally entitled to read, Michael Powell of Powell's Books said in a statement: It is also a victory for booksellers who do not want to ask 13-year-olds for
identification or risk going to jail for selling a Judy Blume book. The ruling from a three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit applied to two Oregon laws:
- It struck down a law against furnishing sexually explicit material to children — those under 13.
- It struck down part of a law against furnishing images or descriptions of sexual conduct to minors, ie those under 18.
The judgement left intact a part that forbids using such material when the purpose is inducing the minor to engage in sexual conduct. Spokesman Tony Green of the state attorney general's office said no decision had been made on an
appeal.
|
21st September | |
| US law allows authorities wide powers to close down websites in the name of file sharing
| From news.cnet.com
|
A group of senators want to hand the U.S. Department of Justice the power to shut down Web sites dedicated to the illegal sharing online of film, music, software, and other intellectual property. The Combating Online Infringement and
Counterfeits Act will give the Department of Justice an expedited process for cracking down on these rogue Web sites regardless of whether the Web site's owner is located inside or outside of the United States, according to a statement from Senator
Patrick Leahy, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and committee member Senator Orin Hatch. Under the proposed legislation, the Justice Department would file a civil action against accused pirate domain names. If the domain name resides in
the U.S., the attorney general could then request that the court issue an order finding that the domain name in question is dedicated to infringing activities. The Justice Department would have the authority to serve the accused site's U.S.-based
registrar with an order to shut down the site. According to a staffer from Leahy's office, if the site resides outside the United States, the bill would authorize the attorney general to serve the court order on other specified third parties,
such as Internet service providers, payment processors, and online ad network providers. The way it sounds, the Justice Department would try to block these sites from being accessed by people in the United States or cut them off from credit
card transactions or receiving ad revenue from U.S. companies.
|
21st September | | |
Australian TV censor harangues channel for not cutting enough for the advertised M rating
| From acma.gov.au
|
Australia's TV censor, The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA), has found that ABC TV breached the rules by incorrectly classifying Australian film The Proposition as M, despite it containing frequent and realistic scenes of
violence. Correct classification of films on television meaningfully guides the audience in deciding what is appropriate for them and their families, said ACMA Chairman, Chris Chapman. In this instance, the ABC did not go far enough to
modify The Proposition from its cinematic release—classified MA 15+—so as to be suitable for classification and broadcast as M. M is an advisory certificate recommending a 'mature' audience. MA15+ is mandatory age 15 rating. The ACMA
investigation found that The Proposition , as broadcast by the ABC, contained frequent, realistic treatments of detailed violence. The broadcast also included a high impact and prolonged scene of violence at the film's climax that was unsuitable
for an M audience. The ABC has indicated it will ensure any future broadcasts of the film will be televised with an MA15+ classification. It will also provide a copy of the final investigation report to its classification staff as part of training
sessions.
|
21st September | | |
Protestors against adult video shop find little support from the customers
| From menofjc.com
|
The Men of Jesus Christ reported on their website: On 18th September about 40 people came out to protest against Family Video and the fact that they distribute pornography in the town of Tonawanda in New York State.
There were many people that we spoke to that were totally unaware of this and immediately turned around. Of course there was the flip side as well, where people were so desensitized to
pornography that they just did not care. And there were those that came out and told us that they were OK with it and it should be there. There was even a situation in which a woman and her 12 and 6 year old, just to spite the protest, said to the
manager, in front of her children, Can you point me to the dirtiest movie you have in here? . This is the problem that this country faces, the fact that pornography is legal, but just because it is legal does
not make it right. The major response I received from people who were pro-porn was that I may not agree with it, but what you do in your home is your business and if you don't like it, then don't rent it .
|
20th September | | |
Irish film censor bans the original I spit on Your Grave
| From thefancarpet.com
|
The Irish film censor (IFCO) has banned the DVD re-release of the 1978 horror film I Spit on Your Grave starring Camille Keaton. UK fans of the infamous cult film will be able to purchase the ultimate collector's edition on DVD
and Blu-ray albeit cut by the BBFC. However Irish fans of the cult video nasty will be prohibited from purchasing locally, forcing them to import UK versions from internet retailers. The decision to ban the DVD re-release of the cult
classic film was due to the film depicting acts of gross violence and cruelty (including mutilation and torture) towards humans. Director Meir Zarchi commented on the ban: It doesn't surprise me that Ireland have decided to ban the film.
It has relentlessly continued to shock and offend audiences since 1978 when it was first released, and it still does to this date. However, with the level of graphic violence and horror available these days, it's surprising that IFCO sees this 1978 film
more offensive than some of the most daring and empty of content torture porn available today. Since the birth of the Internet all censor boards around the world have instantly become irrelevant. IFCO included. Anyone anywhere in the
universe can simply push a button on any video website store and order a disc of I Spit On Your Grave. There are no iron curtains in the skies that can stop it from landing at his or her door. Are we going through the Lady
Chatterley's Lover syndrome all over again? The bottom line - thank you IFCO for promoting the film in Ireland. The Original Cult Video Nasty is available today on UK DVD and Blu-ray as an ultimate collector's edition dual format - still
cut but less so than previous releases.
|
20th September | | |
Journalists heavily restricted in reporting military trials at Guantánamo Bay
| Based on article from nytimes.com
|
The Obama administration has made many pledges of transparency and openness, but neither of those fundamental principles were anywhere to be seen when the Pentagon opened its first military trial at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, under President Obama.
What we did see were intolerable limitations on journalists covering the trial — or at least trying to cover it. Journalists were required always to be in the company of a soldier — even when they went to the bathroom. Military censors routinely
deleted photographs from cameras. Responding to an outcry by news organizations, including The New York Times, the Pentagon has announced a revised set of rules. Most important, the Pentagon's public affairs division has agreed not to ask
reporters to withhold information deemed privileged by the military if the information is already in the public domain. Under the revised policy, reporters will not be deemed in violation of the rules if what they report was legitimately obtained in the course of newsgathering outside Guantánamo.
The Pentagon has eased somewhat the rules for photographers and videographers. There will now be a more formal chain of appeal to challenge decisions by military censors. They will also be allowed to have up to two images a day cropped rather than
blocked entirely.
|
20th September | | |
The Economist held by Sri Lanka customs
| From lankabusinessonline.com
|
Sri Lanka has allowed its citizens to read the latest issue of The Economist magazine, which carries a story on a controversial change in the country's constitution after being held back by customs authorities for nearly a week. Any
material that comes to Sri Lanka should fall into the standards that we have set out, information minister Keheliya Rambukwelle told reporters. One is that it must not make any kind of allegations within the country - could be civil - in
terms of articles. So that has to be scrutinized. But that won't take time, unless it is really detrimental to the sovereignty. The Economist had not been released by Sri Lanka's customs authorities for nearly a week after it arrived in the
country last Friday. The held back Economist referred to a contentious change to the constitution which nullified an earlier attempt to create a more independent public service and reduce arbitrary rule. Responding to reporter's questions
about which unit at Customs was legally empowered to censor publications, Rambukwelle denied there was censorship but said a customs unit like those that probed drugs looked at publications also. The minister said authorities examined whether a
publication affected national security , sovereignty or promoted racial disharmony, as a government policy before release.
|
19th September | | |
|
Twitter and a terrifying tale of modern Britain See article from guardian.co.uk |
18th September | | |
Czech court orders ban on Hitler's Mein Kampf
| |
A court has ordered a Czech publisher to withdraw and destroy all its published copies of Adolf Hitler's Mein Kampf. Prague's municipal court issued the verdict at the request of the German state of Bavaria that was suing the publisher,
KMa, for copyright infringement. Mein Kampf is banned in Germany and Bavaria, which holds the copyright for the book, is seeking to block its publication in other countries for fear it could be misused by right-wing extremists. The
1925 book expresses Hitler's desire to exterminate Jews and occupy territory in Eastern Europe. The publisher can appeal the verdict.
|
18th September | | |
India unbans Satyajit Ray's Sikkim
| Based on article from
bbc.co.uk
|
India has finally lifted the ban on a documentary film made on the Himalayan state of Sikkim by the legendary director Satyajit Ray, his family said. The film was banned after Sikkim merged with India under controversial circumstances in 1975.
It was made 40 years ago when Sikkim was an independent kingdom - Sikkim's last ruler Palden Thondup Namgyal commissioned the film to woo tourists. Ray died in April 1992 after receiving an Oscar for lifetime achievement. His son,
Sandip Ray, also a film-maker, told the BBC that he was delighted that the ban on the documentary - called Sikkim - had been lifted. When the film was completed, the king and his wife were reportedly furious - especially over a shot that
showed poor people scrambling for leftover food behind the royal palace in the capital, Gangtok. My father was asked to drop some shots and redo the final product, said Sandip Ray. He did that but the situation changed. By the time
the final cut emerged, Sikkim had been merged with Indian under rather controversial circumstances in 1975. Unsure how the people of Sikkim would react to the controversial shots in the film, the Indian government decided to ban Sikkim. Except
for a private screening by my father, the film has not been seen by anybody else, Ray said. The two existing copies of the film are in the US and the British Film Institute.
|
18th September | | |
European Court reaffirms protection of journalistic sources
| From swradioafrica.com
|
The European Court of Human Rights has unanimously held that media premises are exempt from police searches, marking a major victory for press freedom across the continent. This ruling was an acid test for the Court and for media freedom across
Europe, said Geoffrey Robertson QC, counsel for a coalition of intervening organizations. It sets a high benchmark for protection of journalistic materials and will force police and prosecutors across Europe, from Russia to France, to change their
practices. In its decision in Sanoma v. the Netherlands, the Court reversed an earlier ruling and held that police cannot search media premises or seize journalistic materials unless they can show it is absolutely necessary in the
investigation of a serious crime and have obtained a judicial warrant. In this judgment, the European Court lays down a clear marker for the protection of journalistic materials, said Peter Noorlander, legal director at the Media Legal
Defence Initiative. This will force a change in law and practice across Europe, not only in countries like Russia and Romania but also in France and the Netherlands, where new legislation is now required. The Court today said in the
clearest terms that all European nations must have strong laws that protect the media's fundamental right to confidential sources in order to ensure the public's right to know. Every country must now review their laws and ensure that these rights are
fully respected. said David Banisar, Senior Legal Counsel for ARTICLE 19.
|
18th September | | |
Mozambique SMS service turned off as text messages used to encourage food riots
| Based on article from
theregister.co.uk
|
A letter apparently from the Mozambique communications authority asked mobile networks to block text messages during food riots in the southern African country earlier this month. Hundreds of people were arrested over the protests and 13 killed,
after the government put up the price of bread by a third. Petrol and electricity also went up sharply. The riots were encouraged by round-robin text messages. A letter sent by the National Communications Institute asked both Vodacom and M-Cel to
switch off text message functions but only for pre-pay customers. The letter, seen by the BBC, was sent to Mediafax which noted that messaging was unavailable to pre-pay punters on both networks for several days.
|
17th September | | |
Hatchet II is the widest release for an unrated film in 25 years
| Fom blog.moviefone.com
|
This month marks the 20th anniversary of the NC-17 rating, invented by the MPAA to separate certain graphic yet non-pornographic films from the porn connotations of the X rating. But the new classification immediately had its own stigma and many theater
chains and video stores wouldn't carry films with the NC-17 mark. Now AMC Theatres, which has long been one of those against booking films lacking classification, is opening its screens (around 60 locations) to the horror sequel Hatchet II
, which makes this the widest opening for an unrated film in 25 years. (probably referring to The Evil Dead which opened unrated in 128 theaters and took home more than $2 million) It's assumed that following the October 1 release of
Hatchet II, the also-unrated horror release I Spit on Your Grave will be booked in similar fashion. Then what? If the first title is successful -- and I think it has a good shot at being the highest-grossing unrated film of all time -- can
we expect filmmakers to actually start trying to garner an NC-17 just to then go out unrated? Will films that wouldn't even receive an NC-17 exploit the sudden approval by going unrated anyway?
|
17th September | | |
Comic book writer Stan Lee likens video games bans to old comic book bans
| From apexnewsnetwork.com
|
Legendary comic book writer Stan Lee knows a thing or two about censorship. Back in the 1950s when he first unleashed the likes of Spiderman on the world his work, and that of other comic book writers and artists was considered dangerous .
Comics were burned and a Senate committee decided that afford the calculated risk involved in feeding its children, through comic books, a concentrated diet of crime, horror and violence. That is why the now eighty seven year old Lee wrote a
letter the Video Game Voters Network encouraging gamers not to give up the fight against the current calls for video game censorship. In his missive Lee wrote If you restrict sales of video games, you're chipping away at our First
Amendment rights to free speech. He went on to urge all gamers to take a stand and defend both the First Amendment and the rights of computer and video game artists. Lee wrote that he recalls the time when the government was trying to do
to comic books what some politicians now want to do with video games: censor them and prohibit their sales. It was a bad idea half a century ago and it's just as bad an idea now. And you can do something about it.
|
17th September | | |
Clare Balding wins PCC censure of AA Gill for calling her a dyke on a bike
| Based on article from
bbc.co.uk See also
A prissy judgement by the PCC from
independent.co.uk by Stephen Glover
|
Sports presenter Clare Balding's official complaint over an article in the Sunday Times that mocked her sexuality has been upheld. In July, she complained to the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) over AA Gill's review of her new TV show, in
which he called her a dyke on a bike . The paper defended its columnist on freedom of expression grounds, saying he was well-known for his acerbic and sometimes tasteless sense of humour. Balding took exception to Gill's review of
her show, Britain By Bike , claiming his comments were irrelevant to the programme. But the newspaper argued the term dyke had been reclaimed by various groups as an empowering, not an offensive, term. The paper also drew attention
to two organisations, which are both called Dykes on Bikes. The PCC ruled that the use of the word dyke in the article - whatever its intention - was a pejorative synonym relating to the complainant's sexuality . The context was not that the reviewer was seeking positively to 'reclaim' the term, but rather to use it to refer to the complainant's sexuality in a demeaning and gratuitous way
. As such, it represented a breach of the Code. Stephen Abell, director of the PCC, said: Freedom of expression is a key part of an open society and something which the Commission has defended robustly in the past. While the commentator is
clearly entitled to his opinion about both the programme and the complainant, there are restraints placed upon him by the terms of the Editors' Code. It said the clause was very clear that newspapers must avoid prejudicial, pejorative or
irrelevant reference to an individual's sexual orientation and the reference to Miss Balding plainly breached its terms . The presenter has also asked for the newspaper to apologise.
|
17th September | | |
|
ASA easily offended at ad for 'immaculately conceived' ice cream See asa.org.uk |
17th September | | |
|
Witcher 2's nude woman torture scene being reconsidered See article from neoseeker.com |
16th September | | |
A few complaints about Derren Brown's railway escapology stunt
| Based on article from
bbc.co.uk
|
The TV censor Ofcom is investigating illusionist Derren Brown's latest show over a scene which showed a man in a strait jacket, chained to a rail track. The Channel 4 programme, Hero at 30,000 Feet , followed a volunteer with an unconfident character
as Brown built up his courage, enabling him to take on a series of personal challenges. The scene in question saw him escaping from an oncoming train in the scene. Ofcom received 11 complaints from viewers about the safety of the stunt.
The media regulator is investigating the show, broadcast on 8th September, to see if it breaches broadcasting regulations. It will consider whether the scene condones or glamorises violent, dangerous or seriously antisocial behaviour and
is likely to encourage others to copy such behaviour or breaches generally accepted standards in broadcasting. A spokesman for Channel 4 said: The railway track challenge was one of many confidence-building experiences within the
show which prepared Matt for the finale. For all the experiences, the programme-makers have procedures in place to ensure the contestant's welfare was protected.
|
15th September | | |
ASA easily offended at ad for 'immaculately conceived' ice cream
| Based on article
from asa.org.uk
|
A magazine ad for Antonio Federici ice cream showed a heavily pregnant woman dressed as a nun standing in a church holding a tub of ice cream in one hand and a spoon in the other. Text stated Immaculately Conceived ... ICE CREAM IS OUR RELIGION .
Ten readers challenged whether the ad was offensive to Christians, particularly to those who practised Catholicism. Antonio Federici said the idea of conception represented the development of their ice cream. They said their decision
to use religious imagery stemmed from their strong feelings towards their product (they cited the text ICE CREAM IS OUR RELIGION ) and also from their wish to comment on and question, using satire and gentle humour, the relevance and hypocrisy of
religion and the attitudes of the church to social issues. They believed the small number of complaints the ASA had received represented a very small proportion of the readership of the publications. They did not believe offence had been so deeply felt
as to affect their right, as marketers, to free expression and that offence caused to a small minority should not affect the ability of the wider public to see their ad. They believed that, as a form of art and self-expression, advertising should be
challenging and often iconoclastic. The publishers of The Lady magazine had received eight complaints made direct to them. They said that, in hindsight, it had been a misjudgement on their part to publish the ad. They regretted the offence that
had been caused to their readers and said they would not publish the ad or anything similar to it in future. Grazia said they considered the statement ICE CREAM IS OUR RELIGION suggested that the ad was intended to be lighthearted and not
mocking of any religious groups. They said the editorial content of Grazia encouraged debate and questioning. As such, they believed the ad was unlikely to cause serious or widespread offence to their readers. ASA
Assessment: Upheld The ASA noted that the CAP Code stated that ads should contain nothing that is likely to cause serious or widespread offence. Particular care should be taken to avoid causing offence on the grounds of race,
religion, sex, sexual orientation or disability. Compliance with the Code will be judged on the context, medium, audience, product and prevailing standards of decency . We considered the use of a nun pregnant through immaculate conception was likely
to be seen as a distortion and mockery of the beliefs of Roman Catholics. We concluded that to use such an image in a light hearted way to advertise ice cream was likely to cause serious offence to readers, particularly those who practised the Roman
Catholic faith. We noted that the number of complaints was relatively small but that the ad had been placed in a small number of publications only. The ad breached CAP Code clause 5.1 (Decency).
|
15th September | | |
A new UK release for The Bronx Warriors
| UK 2010 Argent/Shameless R2 DVD
at UK Amazon for release on 11th October 2010
|
The Bronx Warriors is a 1982 Italy Sci-Fi film by Enzo G. Castellari. See IMDb The certificate was reduced to 15 uncut for:
- UK 2010 Argent/Shameless R2 DVD at UK Amazon for release on 11th October 2010
- UK
2009 Argent/Shameless Trilogy R0 DVD at UK Amazon
Previously rated 18 uncut for:
- UK 2003 Michael Lee/Vipco R2 DVD
And before that the BBFC cut 12s for an 18 rating for:
- UK 1993 Simitar VHS
- UK 1986 EIV VHS
- UK 1983 cinema release
See cuts details on IMDb :
- Cut to edit the killing of the tramp and a man's face being hit with a baseball bat.
Review from US Amazon : Cult classic
17-year-old Mark Gregory stars as Trash, leader of The Riders - a motorcycle gang that survive in the Bronx of the future. Crime has supposedly risen to such impossible heights that the police have abandoned the Bronx to
its own devices - the gangs now rule the streets.
Originally made in Italian (although filmed in the Bronx) as I Guerrieri del Bronx , this cult classic was later dubbed into English. Only recently released in its uncut version, it was
notorious for its violence and suffered extensive cuts in both its original UK and US releases. It also featured a lot of real Hell's Angels as the supporting bikers. It has to be said that these days the violence in
it looks quite restrained and won't shock as many as it once did. Suspension of disbelief is definitely required in order to deal with gangs who roller skate or tap dance, but the imagery of it all remains quite vivid.
|
15th September | | |
Thailand pressures FCCT to cancel press conference
| 15th September 2010. Based on article
from cpj.org |
The Thai government acted inappropriately in pressuring the Correspondents Club of Thailand (FCCT) to cancel a press conference that would have criticized Vietnam, the Committee to Protect Journalists have said. The Bangkok-based FCCT had intended
to host a press conference by the Paris-based International Federation for Human Rights and the Vietnam Committee on Human Rights (VCHR). The two independent rights groups had planned to launch a new report called From Rhetoric to Reality: Human
Rights in Vietnam, under its Chairmanship of ASEAN 2010. The FCCT said in a statement that the ministry first contacted it by telephone on September 9 to request that the club cancel the press conference because it might contain information
detrimental to a neighboring country. The ministry also requested that the FCCT inform the event's two scheduled speakers, VCHR's Vo Van Ai and Penelope Faulkner, that the ministry would deny them visas on arrival upon landing in Thailand. The event
was then formally cancelled by the two groups. The FCCT provides an important space for journalists to meet and exchange ideas with newsmakers and that space should remain open and free of restrictions, said Shawn Crispin, CPJ's Senior
Southeast Asia Representative. Regrettably, the pressure put on the FCCT is consistent with a wider crackdown on the free press and Internet under way in Thailand. Thani Thongphakdi, head of the Thai ministry's Department of Information,
wrote in a September 10 e-mail to the FCCT that the government attaches great importance to the principles of freedom of expression and diversity of views ...BUT... that it also has a long-standing position of not allowing organizations
and/or persons to use Thailand as a place to conduct activities detrimental to other countries. There are rising concerns among Bangkok-based journalists that the Thai government will become less tolerant of such programs to guard against
regional criticism of its own anti-democratic tendencies. Update: Vietnam thanks Thailand for gagging human rights criticism 15th September 2010. Based on
article from
monstersandcritics.com
The Vietnamese government has thanked Thailand for preventing two activists from travelling to Bangkok to present a report criticising human rights in Vietnam. Vietnam welcomes Thailand's refusal to allow Thai territory to be used for
activities opposing Vietnam, government spokeswoman Nguyen Phuong Nga said. She said the action was appropriate to the friendly and cooperative relations between Vietnam and Thailand, and to the charter of the Association of South-East
Asian Nations (ASEAN).
|
15th September | |
| British teenager banned from the US over angry email to Obama
| Based on
article from dailymail.co.uk
|
A British teenager has been banned from America for life for sending Barack Obama an abusive email, in which he calls the President a 'prick'. Luke Angel, 17, insulted Obama while drunk after watching a programme about the 9/11 attacks on the U.S.
Angel was reprimanded by police on both sides of the Atlantic after firing off the message to the White House. The FBI intercepted the message and contacted police in the UK who went to see Angel at his home. The college student is now on a
list of people who are banned from visiting the States. When asked about the ban, Luke said: I don't really care. My parents aren't very happy about it. The police who came round took my picture and told me I was banned from America forever.
A Bedfordshire Police spokesman said: The individual sent an email to the White House full of abusive and threatening language. We were informed by the Metropolitan Police and went to see him. He said, "Oh dear, it was me".
Police will take no criminal action.
|
15th September | |
| Nepal debates internet censorship
| Based on
article from
thehimalayantimes.com
|
Journalists have supposedly streesed the need to regulate internet and online journalism to curb the violation of freedom of expression. They aired their views at a discussion in the capital. The meeting was called in response to the Nepal
Telecommunication Authority asking ISPs to filter internet content. According to the Electric Transaction Act 2006, ISPs should restrict storing, disseminating, broadcasting web sites containing pornography, horror and extreme violence. However, pornography, horror, communal violence and contempt of court are not well-defined, according to lawyers Santosh Sigdel and Baburam Aryal, who jointly presented papers on
Freedom of Expression on Cyberspace and Internet Regulation in Nepal . Sigdel and Aryal said: filtering web content without clear legal provision might violate freedom of expression and breach the right to privacy. There was
agreement that web content should only be censored after a clear legal definition of the acts and regulations; otherwise, it may create chaos.
|
14th September | | |
Mothers' Union shake its rattle at 'sexualisation'
| Based on article from
themothersunion.org See also report at byebuychildhood.org
|
The christian campaign organisation writes: Mothers' Union believes children should be valued as children, not consumers. However, childhood has become a marketing opportunity worth £99 billion in the UK. Marketers
target children's natural inexperience, through methods such as celebrity endorsement, in order to reach not only children's pocket money but also the household purse. These commercial pressures encourage materialism which negatively affects children's
wellbeing, family life and peer relationships, and can encourage values that Jesus taught against. The use of sexualised content and the imposition of sexuality on children to market and sell goods is particularly concerning. Families can feel
overwhelmed by this commercialisation of childhood and unsure how to challenge powerful marketing initiatives. In response to this, Mothers' Union is launching a major campaign to:
- Raise awareness of the commercialisation of childhood
- Empower families to address the influences of the commercial world within the home
- Hold the UK
Government accountable to its pledge to address the commercialisation and sexualisation of childhood; and through Mothers' Union members lobby political representatives in the UK and Republic of Ireland.
From the report: Regulatory bodies responsible for rating films and video games do not do enough to protect children Agree: 52% Disagree: 29%
Don't know: 19% TV programmes that are inappropriate for children are often shown before the 9pm watershed Agree: 67%
Disagree: 25% Don't know: 8% Source: ComRes for Mothers' Union
|
13th September | | |
|
Is US prudishness ruining the internet? See article from theregister.co.uk |
12th September | |
| Stephen Conroy keeps his job as minister for internet censorship
| Based on article
from itwire.com
|
Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard has been rejigging her government. As expected, Senator Conroy retains the Broadband, Communications and Digital Economy portfolio in the Gillard Government's new Ministry, and has been given an additional
role as Minister Assisting the Prime Minister on Digital Productivity. Ploughing On Based on
article from smh.com.au
The Communications Minister, Stephen Conroy, is ploughing ahead with his internet filter policy despite there being virtually no chance any enabling legislation will pass either house of Parliament. Independent MP Rob Oakeshott, the
Opposition and the Greens have all come out against the policy, leaving it effectively dead in the water. The Greens communications spokesman, Scott Ludlam, has called on the government to end the facade and drop the internet censorship scheme once and
for all, as it was wasting time and taxpayers' money. University of Sydney Associate Professor Bjorn Landfeldt said, given the catastrophic election result after only one term in government, it was remarkable the government was pushing
the very issues that undermined their credibility, rather than focusing their energy on important societal issues . One may wonder exactly what underlies this relentless pursuit of a mirage, given that there is just about zero support outside the
cabinet . Surely it is no longer a matter of believing that the policy would benefit the general public. Senator Ludlam said in a phone interview that he wanted the review of RC guidelines to still go ahead but the government should
drop the internet filtering policy altogether. It [the RC review] was quite transparently a political stalling tactic but that didn't make it a bad idea, he said: [The filter] is just a complete waste of chamber time. It's a waste of
public servants' time who for the next 10 months are going to be progressing a mandatory filter proposal that has no chance of passing either house of parliament now.
|
12th September | | |
Zimbabwe bans band for spitting image like take on Robert Mugabe
| Based on article from telegraph.co.uk See video
from youtube.com
|
The government of Zimbabwe has banned South African band Freshlyground over a Spitting Image-style music video which portrays its ageing president Robert Mugabe as afraid to relinguish power. The band, which is made up of South Africans,
Zimbabweans and Mozambicans and has a pan-African following, was due to perform a concert in the capital Harare next month. But this week, Zimbabwe's Immigration Department revoked its working visas without explanation, just days after the launch
of the Chicken to Change song. The song and accompanying video is the result of a collaboration between Freshlyground, best known for performing the World Cup anthem Waka Waka with Shakira, and controversial cartoonist Jonathan Shapiro,
most recently in hot water for portraying South African president Jacob Zuma as raping Lady Justice. You promised always to open the doors for us. Indeed it is you and only you who sleeps with the key. You are chicken to change, lead
singer Zolani Mahola sings, as Mugabe, in a puff of feathers, transforms into a poultry version of his former self in the back of his presidential limo. Thierry Cassuto, the executive producer of ZA News, the satirical news programme that features
Zapiro's latex puppets and created the music video, said the chicken for change was not a protest song but an appeal to Mugabe's conscience. We knew that if there was someone watching in Harare who didn't have a sense of humour, they wouldn't
have liked it, he said: People can read their own meanings into this video. It's a pity that Freshlyground have had their permits cancelled because they are popular in Zimbabwe. What kind of a threat does this song really represent?
|
12th September | | |
Human rights organisations pan Azerbaijan
| Based on article from
aysor.am
|
Ten international NGOs, among them Freedom House, Article 19, Index on Censorship, Institute for War and Peace Reporting, International Federation of Journalists, Media Diversity Institute, Press Now, Open Society Foundations, Reporters without borders,
and World Association of Newspapers and News Publishers, adopted on September 9 a joint statement following their three-day mission to Azerbaijan. The mission aimed to meet journalists, human rights defenders, government officials and other civil
society activists on critical freedom of expression issues in advance of the country's parliamentary elections planned in November. Representatives from the organizations highlighted their serious concerns regarding the deteriorating freedom of
expression situation in Azerbaijan, including the continued imprisonment of journalists and bloggers, acts of violence and ill-treatment against journalists. The international human rights mission called for Azerbaijan's authorities:
- to free immediately the three jailed journalists and never practice such kind of arrests in future
- to launch an immediate investigation into the cases of suppressing and hunting media
- to decriminalize defamation
- to spread
honestly and fairly the state advertisement
- to establish a commission supporting media
- to establish an independent body to regulate broadcasting-related issues
- to lift up the ban on foreign radio stations
- to invest in
the Internet and improve the access to Internet
- to provide candidates with the same access to the on-line media during the election campaigns, and etc.
|
11th September | | |
US release of Destricted has taken 4 years to collect the 2257 age record keeping requirements for explicit films
| Based on article
from thedailybeast.com
|
A film by Matthew Barney, Marina Abramovic, Richard Prince and other artists that's playing at the Los Angeles Downtown Film Festival is so graphic that it took four years to get U.S. distribution. This week's Los Angeles Downtown Film
Festival, which will bring together sex and art by some of the world's most innovative and provocative artists and directors, is shadowed by controversy with the screening of the much-talked-about art/sex film, Destricted . Destricted
, an art-based film in which multiple directors—among them Larry Clark (Kids), artists Matthew Barney and Marina Abramovic, and photographer Sam Taylor-Woods—explore modernistic views of sex, sexuality, and pornography in modern film. Formed
in 2004 as a brand (instead of strictly as a film) and originally released in September 2006 in the U.K., Destricted won awards at a range of international film festivals, including Cannes, Sundance, Edinburgh, Amsterdam and Locarno. Despite Destricted's
successful debuts, the film would have to wait four years for its U.S. release. All this time, Destricted has been tied up in American laws governing pornography, which dictate that anyone who appears in a sexually explicit film must be
legally documented as over 18. Because some shorts were filmed overseas, under disparate conditions, and perhaps without the artists' foreseeing the necessity of such documentation, some didn't have proper papers, thus they could not be released for
profit (which is why admission to the festival screening is free). Just this year, Destricted amassed the necessary documents to clear eight shorts for commercial distribution in the U.S., which will happen in November, via DVD and a small
theatrical release. Destricted 's roster of shorts varies from the international release, to the U.S. release, to what is screened at the festival: the U.S. version features eight short reels, all of which are explicit in nature; six short
films, including some not on the U.S. release, will be screened at the Downtown Film Fest; and seven shorts, a mix-up of the previous lists, appear on the U.K. version. While porn is now a mainstream commodity, its shock value challenged by
saturation and corporate marketing, and, some might say, the loosening of American mores, the films comprising Destricted aim to explore and underscore a still-vibrant polemic: to highlight controversial issues about the representation of
sexuality in art, opening up for debate the question of whether art can be disguised as pornography or whether pornography can be disguised as art, according to the film's creators.
|
11th September | | |
New Australian bill ends role of film censor in prosecutions involving adult films seized by police
| Based on article from theaustralian.com.au
|
Australia's sex industry lobby has condemned proposed new laws which will give New South Wales police powers to classify adult films. The new laws introduced to NSW parliament on Wednesday lower evidence requirements for police pursuing
prosecutions against persons suspected of illegally selling adult films. Under current laws, police are required submit films to the film censors to verify their rating. However, under the proposed new laws, police would be able to side-step the
requirement by offering film vendors facing pornography charges agreements that the films would be found to be classed illegal to sell if submitted to the classification board. Those who demand that films be submitted to the board for
formal classification will be forced to foot the bill if they're found guilty of pornography offences. The sex industry lobby says it's an attempt to coerce adult video sellers to plead guilty to illegal pornography charges without evidence.
The laws would see large numbers of adult film vendors jailed and encourage police corruption, Australian Sex Party President Fiona Patten said: Most police officers do not understand the differences between R18+, X18+ and Refused Classification
(RC) material. This is a truly frightening move toward a police state in NSW. If the shop owners say they are not happy with the police evaluation of their films then under the new laws they will have to pay for the classification fee themselves. But
this is what is already happening so the Attorney General is being extremely disingenuous in his reasons for this . NSW Parliamentary Secretary Barry Collier introduced the bill, the Classification (Films, Publications and Computer Games)
Enforcement Amendment Bill 2010, for in-principle agreement on Wednesday. He said that it would address rising costs for police enforcing NSW classification laws. The bill also introduces measures that will allow the Director of the Classification
Board to pull material for sale in NSW once it has been flagged by another state and territory.
|
11th September | | |
Google instant (sensibly) bans porn terms from being predicted from partially typed words
| Based on article from
advocate.com
|
The Web is buzzing about Google's latest advancement, Google Instant, which doesn't even wait for the user to click the search button after typing a query. It simply goes straight to the page by predicting what you will type, as you type it. However, it's been discovered that the
autocomplete excludes certain terms related to pornography, violence and hate speech, according to Google. The feature also happens to exclude the words bisexual and lesbian while allowing homosexual, gay, queer,
dyke, transvestite, and transgender to be searchable instantly. A petition at Change.org urges the search engine giant to reverse the censorship, as the terms are not exclusive to pornography.
Google's FAQ Based on article from google.com Q:
If an offensive or lewd word is a fraction of my query, will Google push these results in front of me as I type? A: As always, we provide options to filter the content you see in search. You can choose to set SafeSearch to filter out explicit
content, and parents can lock SafeSearch to the strict setting. In addition, autocomplete excludes certain terms related to pornography, violence and hate speech.
|
11th September | | |
PinkNews.co.uk blocked for under 18s on mobile phones
| Based on
article from pinknews.co.uk
|
PinkNews.co.uk readers have complained that their mobile phone providers block access to gay websites – with five of the major companies implicated. Last week, PinkNews revealed that T-Mobile blocks gay news, travel and support websites which
contain no offensive content, including PinkNews.co.uk. Since then, Virgin Mobile, 3, O2 and Vodafone have also been flagged by readers as blocking gay websites. Some readers have reported that websites such as Stonewall.org.uk, which offers
advice on issues such as homophobic bullying, are also blocked. The two issues are the blocking of all gay content (including adult content) for those who can prove they are over 18, and the blocking of gay websites which contain no adult content
for those under 18. Sixteen-year-old reader Harriet Bettany told us: I'm with Virgin Mobile and am unable to access most LGBT-related websites. Amongst those I can't access are the Queer Youth Network and Gay Youth Corner, sites meant for under
18s.Other sites I visit frequently and can't access on my mobile are After Ellen and The Lesbian and Gay Foundation, I can however get onto PinkNews.co.uk. I'm 16 and don't see why I should have to lie about my age to access perfectly innocent sites.
An O2 spokeswoman said that contract customers over the age of 18 could view PinkNews.co.uk on their phones but admitted that those under the age of 18 cannot. The owners of PinkNews.co.uk are considering whether there are grounds for a
legal case. Company secretary and solicitor to PinkNews.co.uk, Richard Cohen, said: This might be a breach of the Equality Act and it is damaging to gay young people who need to access information about their sexuality. Clearly, they are not going to
call up a customer services advisor to complain.
|
11th September | | |
Minnesota county bans employees from staying in hotels with in-room porn
| Based on article from
todaysthv.com
|
A county in Minnesota is taking a stance about pornography. In most situations, Winona County will no longer reimburse workers for staying at hotels that offer pay-per view pornography. Winona County is now the first in the USA to pass a clean
hotel policy. The decision makes employees stay in porn-free hotels if they want reimbursement. Chuck Derry with the Gender Violence Institute claims: Contemporary pornography 90% of it is degrading and violent towards women and girls. For
the board members, it was an ethical decision. Derry says, The public is not going to pay for employees that stay in establishments that support this kind of material. Policy initiators hope this action will cause a ripple effect throughout
the US.
|
11th September | | |
Uganda nutter minister proposes extreme penalties for minor erotics
| Based on article from
monitor.co.ug
|
A proposed anti-pornography law could see journalists and ISPs jailed for terms ranging from five to 10 years and their businesses closed, 'Ethics' Minister James Nsaba Buturo said. Buturo said pornography, which he described as a terrible
vice, was growing in the country but the laws against it were too weak. He said the new law, which extensively expands the definition of pornographic material and the accompanying sanctions, will help rein in offenders. Those who deal in
pornographic materials, your days are numbered, Buturo said. We have finally acted and this time, this law will work because our integrity is not for sale, he told journalists. The Bill, he said also provides for fines. He emphasised
that pornography is evil and makes the mind receptive to other vices such as homosexuality . The current legal provisions on pornography prohibit obscene publications but Buturo says this law is incomprehensive. The issue of pornography
transcends publications and includes communication, speech, entertainment, stage play, broadcast, music, dance, art, fashion, motion picture and audio recording. Under the proposed Bill, pornography is defined as any form of communication from
literature to fashion or photography that depicts unclothed or under-clothed parts of the human body (such as breasts, thighs, buttocks or genitalia), that narrates or depicts sexual intercourse or that describes or exhibits anything that can lead to
erotic stimulation. According to the proposed Bill, pornography includes fashion , implying that women could be arrested for wearing short skirts and skimpy dresses. An increase in pornographic materials in the Ugandan mass media
and nude dancing in entertainment world calls for long legal framework to regulate such vices, he said. Only teaching aides, spouses and sportsmen will get exemptions of punishment from the new law. However, analysts say the flaws of the
proposed law, lies in the broad definition of pornography.
|
10th September | | |
Lamberto Bava's Demons 2 passed 15 uncut
| See article
from bbfc.co.uk
|
Demons 2 is a 1986 Italy horror film by Lamberto Bava. See IMDb The Director's Cut was passed 15 uncut for:
- UK 2010 Arrow R0 DVD at UK Amazon for release on 25th October 2010
Previously the Director's Cut was passed 18 uncut for:
- UK 2000 Divid R2 DVD
- UK 1993 GLS VHS
- UK Avatar VHS
- UK 1987 cinema release
|
10th September | | |
True Legend cinema release cut for a horse fall
| See article
from bbfc.co.uk
|
True Legend is a 2010 China action drama by Woo-ping Yuen. See IMDb The BBFC cut 22s for
The BBFC noted:
- Cut required to remove sight of unsimulated animal cruelty (in this case, a horse being tripped).
|
10th September | |
| Can't we chuck the ASA on the bonfire, too?
| See article from
spiked-online.com by Patrick Hayes
|
We don't need a prudish and unaccountable watchdog to decide how products and services are presented to us. The Lib-Con chancellor George Osborne has announced a bonfire of the quangos with a wide range of bureaucratic, regulatory
bodies being scaled back or biting the dust. Even media and telecoms regulator Ofcom is facing significant cuts. One body bucking this trend, however, is the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA), which will be recruiting new staff to police vast swathes
of the internet previously outside of the watchdog's remit. For the ASA, the internet is better described as the Wild West Web . This is now changing. Apparently, in response to a formal recommendation from a wide cross-section of
UK industry , the ASA will now extend its coverage to all marketing communications emanating from the UK online, including advertising on Facebook and Twitter as well as the websites of companies and organisations of all sizes. Even members of the
public could be censured online if it is found that they have been asked by companies to partake in marketing initiatives. It will be – in the words of ASA chairman Chris Smith - the most comprehensive approach to the regulation of advertising in
website space anywhere in the world . ...Read the full article
|
10th September | | |
UAE bans the video game Mafia II
| Based on article from gamepolitics.com
|
The United Arab Emirates' National Media Council has banned the release of Take-Two Interactive's Mafia II videogame in that country. Nitin Mathew, of the Dubai-based distribution firm Red Entertainment Distribution said that the game
was banned because of its excessive violence and nudity. Mafia II was going to be released at the end of August, but now it will share the same fate as its predecessor Mafia , which was also banished from the UAE.
|
10th September | | |
South Korea seeks to rate even small or non-commercial games
| Based on article from gamepolitics.com
|
Korea's Game Rating Board (GRB) is making life difficult for independent Korean online game makers, strictly enforcing a law that virtually all games published in the country must be rated. Posting to Reddit, a Korean game fan indicated that
GRB recently swooped down upon a website for users of RPG Maker, a free tool that can be used to create role-playing games. While the games created and shared on the site were apparently not for sale, the GRB demanded that all the games shared on the
site must be rated. The forum's moderators were said to have deleted all the games on their website in light of paying the fees. The fees for gaining a rating can also be excessive, as the Korean gamer laid out pricing structures for indie-made
games to get rated. A basic fee is charged per MB, with multipliers applied for network-related games, as well as for different game types and for localization of the game. The example used showed that a developer of a free Korean RPG, with a size of
105MB, would have to pay approximately $71 in order to receive a rating necessary for release of the game. Similarly, Valve Software's Steam is now in the firing line of the GRB, as Team Liquid writes that Steam could be banned in Korea,
due to the fact that neither the service nor games offered through it have been rated.
|
10th September | | |
Russian police call punk band in for interrogation over song lyrics
| Based on article from
mn.ru
|
Soviet-era censorship could be on the way back after police hauled in singer Marya Lyubicheva for questioning over the lyrics of her songs. Lyubicheva, singer with punk group Barto, attracted controversy after her appearance at a rally-concert
last month in support of Khimki forest. One of her songs on Pushkinskaya Ploshchad included lyrics about setting fire to police cars, prompting an invitation to discuss the lyrics with the authorities. After her visit to the station
Lyubicheva said she was asked about the song and the meeting and she was hoping that all the questions to the band would be resolved after her visit to the station. It was clear that they are interested in the meeting's organisers, she told
Interfax after the questioning. But we only answered questions related to the band and the song. They told us that the lyrics had already been adjudged extremist The song in question has lyrics: I am ready and you are ready/ to burn cops' cars
at night/ It is like a rule of life, a sign of good taste/ with regard to those for whom the law is trash. The band explained that the song was about love and was not written as a slogan. It is a story of two young people who met at a
demonstration and are later testing their feelings like this. The question I am ready – are you ready is not a call [for extremism]. Lyubicheva said that she could face a fine or up to three years in prison.
|
9th September | | |
Angela Merkel honours Kurt Westergaard by presenting him a press freedom award
| From m100potsdam.org
|
Danish cartoonist Kurt Westergaard received this year's M100 Media Prize. This year's award is for Freedom of the Press in Europe . Kurt Westergaard created one of the 12 Muhammad cartoons accompanying a feature entitled The Face
of Muhammad , published on 30 September 2005, in the Danish daily Jyllands-Posten. His illustration triggered an international controversy about freedom of speech and sparked world-wide, partly violent demonstrations of Muslims who felt insulted.
It wasn't my intention to attack Islam , stated Westergaard in an interview with Der Spiegel, but instead terrorists who abuse Islam for their spiritual ammunition. Despite an alleged bounty of eleven million Dollar on him and his
colleagues, Westergaard defended the publication by invoking the right to freedom of speech. The board of the M100 Sanssouci Colloquium honours his courage to stand by these democratic values and defend them, notwithstanding threats of violence
and death. The Lord Mayor of Potsdam declared: With Kurt Westergaard we honour a personality who has become a symbol for freedom of speech and opinion. When the drawing of a caricature results in death threats it is our duty to publicly back
the illustrator. The Prize is setting a signal. Based on article from bbc.co.uk
German Chancellor Angela Merkel presented him with the award, saying Westergaard was entitled to draw his caricatures: Europe is a place where a cartoonist is allowed to draw something like this. We are talking here about the freedom of
opinion and the freedom of the press Merkel, who grew up in communist East Germany, added that German people clearly remembered the implications of a lack of freedom and should therefore cherish it: It's about whether in a Western society
with its values he [Mr Westergaard] is allowed to publish his Muhammad cartoons, or not. Is he allowed to do it? Yes he is, Ms Merkel said. She described Europe as a place that respects and values the freedom of belief and religion. Security was tight at Sanssouci palace in Potsdam where the cartoonist told reporters:
Maybe they will try to kill me and maybe they will have success, but they cannot kill the cartoon. Merkel's decision to speak at the event about press freedom has caused some surprise in Germany. One newspaper said she was taking a huge
risk . Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung said that the effect of having a photograph taken with Kurt Westergaard was incalculable, describing it as probably be the most explosive appointment of her chancellorship so far . Germany's Central
Muslim Council (ZMD) criticised Merkel for attending the award ceremony. A ZMD spokesman, Aiman Mazyek, told public broadcaster Deutschlandradio that the Chancellor was honouring someone who in our eyes kicked our prophet, and therefore kicked all
Muslims . He said giving Westergaard the prize in a highly charged and heated time was highly problematic .
|
9th September | |
| Google boss likens internet filtering to a trade barrier
| Based on article from
reuters.com
|
Google's legal chief has called for pressure on governments that censor the Internet, such as China and Turkey, arguing that their blocking access to websites unfairly restrains U.S. businesses and would be unacceptable in physical trade. David
Drummond said: If this (Internet censorship) were happening with physical trade and manufacturing goods, we'd all be saying this violates trade agreements pretty fundamentally. In our view at Google it's high time for us to start really
sinking our teeth into this one, said Drummond. We have great opportunities now with pending trade agreements to start putting some pressure on countries to recognize that Internet freedom not only is a core value -- that we should be holding them
to account from a human rights standpoint -- but also that if you want to be part of the community of free trade, you are going to have to find a way to allow the Internet to be open.
|
9th September | | |
Pitiful obsessive attacks NHS porn mags for IWF and sperm donors
| Based on article from
2020health.org
|
Julia Manning, director of 2020health.org writes: Who said pornography was acceptable in the workplace? An investigation into the use of pornography by NHS fertility clinics - Every so
often we hear of a council worker, a judge or a teacher – someone in a position of trust and authority - being sacked for viewing pornography at work. Pornography is still considered unacceptable in the work environment, and should be illegal. The
Obscene Publications Act was designed to convey the message that it is unacceptable full stop, but the lack of prosecutions would imply that we have been feeble at enforcing this. Not surprisingly, both because of ease of availability and a largely
permissive culture, we have an alarming amount of graphic images that would imply a major disconnect. Is it that in our anti-censor society we have forgotten the negative impact on men, women and children of such material? Or have we subconsciously
accepted the pornographer's line that porn is just another word for sex and we dismiss the evidence base for pornography both encouraging aggressive, debasing treatment of women and being a causative factor in the hyper-sexualisation of our culture?
Either way, the workplace should be a location in which we can work in a safe and healthy environment, where our dignity is not threatened and we feel respected. The presence of pornography would compromise this.
Waste of Space Think Tank Based on article from telegraph.co.uk One in three hospitals which provide fertility services provide pornographic material for donors, according to
a report by nutters posing as a health think tank. Some 17 hospitals disclosed they had bought porn when questioned by 2020health.org, which highlights cases of NHS waste. Most of the magazines were bought from newsagents, but two hospitals
admitted having placed orders with publishers while others said the porn had been donated by staff, patients and visitors, The Sun reported. The think tank said the disclosure was disrespectful to women working for the NHS, many of whom face
uncertain futures thanks to tight budgets.
|
9th September | |
|
|
The curse of swearing in children's books See article from guardian.co.uk |
9th September | | |
Political satire proves brave and popular in Palestine
| Based on article from
guardian.co.uk
|
Palestinian TV viewers are dropping everything to watch local politicians sent up in nightly sketch show The Palestinian TV satire Watan ala Watar tackles controversial issues such as politics, corruption, nepotism and religion. Political rivals Hamas and Fatah are united – in anger. But the bite-sized nightly satirical sketches of
Watan ala Watar have become a Ramadan sensation, cheering thousands of Palestinian television viewers through the holy month. Watan ala Watar – the title roughly translates as country hanging by a thread – has been broadcast
every night since Ramadan began on 11 August. We put issues under the spotlight, and when you make people laugh you reach them, says the show's star and scriptwriter, Imad Farajin: We touch traditionally taboo issues. There have been
discussions about whether to show some episodes, but none have actually been omitted. Sometimes we ourselves feel we have gone too far, especially with religion . The Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas, was approached by critics demanding
the show be taken off the air, according to the Watan ala Watar team. But Yasser Abed Rabbo, a veteran Palestinian politician, defended it, says Farajin. He told the president that we live in a democratic society and that we shouldn't be stopped.
The programme reaches beyond the Palestinian territories, thanks to its appearance on YouTube within an hour of being broadcast, and a Facebook page.
|
8th September | | |
Australian Labor party return to government but hopefully without the support for internet censorship
| Based on article from theaustralian.com.au
|
Labor's bollox internet filter plan faces near-death despite the ascension of Julia Gillard as Australia's 28th prime minister. Ms Gillard won the backing of independent MPs turned powerbrokers Tony Windsor and Rob Oakeshott despite Bob Katter
supporting the Coalition and Tony Abbott. The Coalition vowed to dismantle the plan regardless of last month's election outcome. And with the Greens set to hold the balance of power in the Senate from next July, it is almost certain Labor's
filtering aspirations are as good as dead.
|
8th September | |
| Malaysian TV Ramadan clip canned for being too christmassy
| Based on article
from myfoxny.com See video from
youtube.com
|
A Malaysian TV station said it has withdrawn an advertisement marking the Muslim festival of Eid al Fitr after the ad's Christmas-like theme was criticized for being un-Islamic. The private TV3 channel began airing the one-minute
commercial marking the end of the Ramadan fasting month. The ad showed a man wearing an Islamic skullcap taking children on a magical rickshaw for a ride through the sky. But some viewers in Malaysia said the character was reminiscent of Santa
Claus, and several groups demanded that the ad be retracted. There was also criticism that the ad featured a lotus flower, which is linked to Buddhism. TV3 apologizes on the airing of the advertisement ... which has offended many people, the station said in a statement, adding that it had been taken off the air.
We will be more cautious to avoid similar incidents ... in the future.
|
7th September | | |
Belarus web activist Oleg Bebenin found hanged
| Based on article from
bbc.co.uk
|
Officials in Belarus claim a prominent opposition figure found hanged at his weekend home committed suicide. Oleg Bebenin founded Charter 97, a leading opposition website critical of President Alexander Lukashenko. Colleagues said they
could not believe the father-of-two had killed himself. They pointed out that he had left no note and Charter 97's editor, Natalia Radina, said he had not been having any family or health problems. He had, she told independent Moscow radio station
Ekho Moskvy, been absorbed in his work and campaigning for opposition presidential hopeful Andrei Sannikov. Most independent media in Belarus have been closed down and the authorities barely tolerate political dissent, correspondents say.
|
7th September | | |
Cherie Blair seeks to censor personal note published in Peter Mandelson's memoirs
| Why do letter writers think they can maintain control over their words? The words are unsolicited and have been given away free of charge Based on
article from dailymail.co.uk
|
Cherie Blair has launched a legal action against Peter Mandelson over the publication of details of a private letter in which she made a vitriolic attack on Gordon Brown. Mrs Blair was furious when she read Lord Mandelson's recently published
memoirs, The Third Man , which includes details of a personal note from Cherie after he had to resign from the Cabinet following a home loans scandal in 1998. She said in the note that Mandelson had been the victim of a ‘vicious and
selfish' campaign orchestrated by Mr Brown and his supporters and that she was ‘angry and upset by what had happened'. Blair has now employed lawyers Atkins Thomson, who have written to his publishers, HarperCollins, to demand the removal of the
entire section. In the legal letter, which arrived last week, they also ask for the note to be returned to Blair, and demand £800 (plus VAT) in legal costs. A source at HarperCollins said: We think it is a bit petty. Hasn't her
husband just betrayed a series of confidences in his own book?
|
6th September | | |
Salt set for an uncut 15 rating on DVD
| Based on article
from bbfc.co.uk
|
Salt is a 2010 US spy thriller by Phillip Noyce. See IMDb A re-edited version with an alternative ending was passed 15 uncut for:
- UK 2010 Sony video version
The BBFC explained their rating: SALT is an action espionage thriller starring
Angelina Jolie as CIA agent Evelyn Salt. She is forced to go on the run after being accused by a defector of being a Russian deep-cover sleeper agent. This is an extended version of a film that was classified 12A
in the cinema and 12 on DVD for moderate violence and one use of strong language . Additional material present here meant this version of the film was classified 15 for strong violence. The
BBFC's Guidelines at 12A'/'12 state that Moderate violence is allowed but should not dwell on detail. There should be no emphasis on injuries or blood, but occasional gory moments may be permitted if justified by the context . SALT includes
several fast-paced fight scenes featuring moderate violence, with crunchy kicks and blows. In most scenes little is seen in terms of blood or injury detail but there are a few sequences of strong violence, including a woman being repeatedly beaten and
smashed into a desk as she fights a dirty agent and a woman pulling a chain around a man's neck to throttle him. The film also opens with a torture scene in which a plastic tube is forced into Salt's mouth and filled with water, with some brief emphasis
on her struggle. These stronger scenes exceed the terms of the 12A'/'12 Guidelines and are more appropriately placed at 15 where Violence may be strong but should not dwell on the infliction of pain or injury. The strongest gory images
are unlikely to be acceptable. Strong sadistic or sexualised violence is also unlikely to be acceptable . SALT also contains a single use of strong language that is neither aggressively delivered nor directed. This
would have been permissible at 12A'/'12 where the Guidelines state that The use of strong language (for example, 'fuck') must be infrequent . Previously the BBFC suggested the cuts for 12A for:
This film was originally shown to the BBFC in an unfinished version. The BBFC advised the company that the film was likely to receive a 15 classification but that the requested 12A certificate could be achieved by
making cuts in six sequences in order to reduce a scene of torture, four violent scenes and a scene of strangulation. When the finished version of the film was submitted, all six scenes had been reduced acceptably and the film was classified 12A .
|
6th September | | |
Baptist nutter throws his Bible at UFC fans
| Based on
article from townhall.com
by Adam P Groza
|
How should we as Baptists regard the growing popularity of Mixed Martial Arts (MMA) and the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC)? Simply put, we should hate it.
Psalm 11:5 says, The LORD examines the righteous and the wicked. He hates the lover of violence. This is a hard verse for at least two reasons. First, it does not say that God simply hates violence, but rather, that God hates
those who love violence. Second, it confronts our culture's lust for violence, a lust which many Christians indulge rather than reject. UFC and MMA comprise a lucrative mainstream business of entertainment violence.
Gate revenue for UFC fights in 2007 totaled $2.8 million and $200 million for pay-per-view. An international phenomenon, one UFC fight in Dublin sold all 10,000 seats in two weeks. Surprisingly, an estimated one-third of fans are female. UFC and MMA
fighters have been featured on mainstream shows such as 60 Minutes and Dr. Phil, and on ESPN. What exactly are people paying to see? MMA and UFC offer a simple formula. Two people are put in an enclosed
or confined space, usually an octagon cage, and fight until one of them is deemed (by the referee) too injured to continue or taps out , meaning he just can't take any more beating. Fighters wear minimally padded gloves which lead to more blood,
and those bloody images are then used to market the sport. Those who pay to see the fights also pay to see octagon girls, scantily clad eye-candy between bouts. MMA and UFC are far from a harmless sport. They
are a sinful amalgam of blood lust and female objectification that reflects our cultures growing desensitization to the inherent value of human life. UFC and MMA amounts to violence porn, a term which has been applied
to movies with wanton violence such as SAW, where violence is not part of the plot, it is the attraction. Violence for violence's sake, as opposed to instrumental or redeeming violence, desensitizes the viewer to the graphic horror of watching two
people pummel each other for the sake of entertainment. UFC and MMA offer exactly the kind of violence condemned in Psalm 11:5. Ezekiel 7:23 decries, the city is full of violence. Why are Christians supporting violence in the city?
Early Christians were objects of violent persecution, being thrown into Roman coliseums for the amusement of the masses. Two-thousand years later, some Christians are now in the stands, cheering and supporting the blood and
violence. Christians must avoid any support or association with the entertainment violence of MMA and UFC. We must not envy the men of violence or choose any of their ways (Proverbs 3:31). Or have we forgotten the
words of Christ? Blessed are the peacemakers.
|
6th September | | |
Recent re-release of the video nasty: The Slayer
| UK 2010 Cornerstone R2 DVD
at UK Amazon
|
The Slayer is a 1981 US horror by JS Cardone . See IMDb Passed 18 uncut for:
- UK 2010 Cornerstone R2 DVD at UK Amazon
- UK 2001 Protected/Vipco R0 DVD
Previously the BBFC cut 14s for an 18 rating for:
From IMDb:
- Edited to shorten a pitchfork murder
And before that, Vipco released the uncut VHS in June 1982. It appeared on the video nasties list in October 1983 but was dropped in April 1985 Review from
UK Amazon : Minimal Gore The
Vipco DVD is grainy and washed out. The film is quite good. two couples fly to a quiet island for a well-earned break, but Kay knows the horror that is waiting for them & sure enough they are killed off by this monster.
Once the killings start & the storm comes, there's a good atmosphere . Unfortunately, the gore is way too minimal - with a decent pitchforking scene being its only saviour.
|
6th September | | |
Zimbabwe dusts off old entertainment licence law
| Based on article from
swradioafrica.com
|
It's reported the Zimbabwe's censorship board has declared it will now be a crime for artists to perform without an entertainment licence. Solomon Chitungo, an official with the Censorship Board, is quoted as saying; This is not a new thing it
has always been there but it's just that it was not applied strictly and artists have been performing illegally. The certificate will be valid for 12 months. It's just like a drivers licence, we are also just issuing a licence to provide entertainment
and if one is to be found without the certificate we will stop the show and confiscate their equipment, he said. Newsreel has been told artists will now need to pay US$25 a year while institutions will have to cough up US$155 a year to get the
entertainment licence. While the law is not new, as the censorship board official admitted, their motivation in dusting-off an outdated law from Ian Smith's Rhodesian regime is meant to find yet another way of controlling free expression.
|
6th September | | |
Police raid magazine over report on riot police
| Based on article from
rferl.org
|
Armed policemen, including masked special-forces officers, have raided the Moscow office of the The New Times , one of Russia's few opposition-minded media outlets. During the raid, on September 2, Russian police Colonel Stanislav
Pashkovsky pressed the magazine's editor in chief, Yevgenia Albats, to hand over recordings of interviews and other material used in a February report on alleged abuse of power by the country's feared OMON riot police. The magazine posted videos
of the raid on its website. The article in question, entitled Slaves of OMON , cited police sources who alleged that riot police have been given permission to commit abuses when breaking up protests: It was an article about the
violations taking place inside Moscow's OMON -- how they are given instructions on how to break up Marches of Dissent, how it is explained to them that supporters of the Russian opposition are the enemies of Russia, Albats said.
|
5th September | | |
Mexico 'offended' by flag cartoon
| Based on article from
story.malaysiasun.com
|
A cartoon penned by a US artist depicting the Mexican flag and its eagle riddled with bullets and dead in a pool of blood has incited offense across Mexico. Many Mexicans have accused the American cartoonist, Daryl Cagle, of mocking their country
and its national symbol (the eagle) during a difficult time in the nation's history. Editorial cartoonists look for readily recognizable metaphors and that's an obvious one for Mexico, Cagle told CNN, appearing unmoved by the reaction to
his drawing. As any democratic society, Mexico respects and defends freedom of speech and freedom of expression, in any way it's manifested ...[BUT]... Regarding the case of Mr. Cagle's cartoon, we differ on the use he makes of the
Mexican flag and the message it conveys, read a statement released by the Mexican embassy in Washington.
|
5th September | | |
Indian censors offended by minor quip about bank note
| Based on
article from
movies.ndtv.com
|
The Indian movie Knock-Out is in censor trouble. The trailer of the thriller has been banned by the censor board for an allegedly derogatory reference made by star Irrfan Khan to the 1000-rupee note. Apparently in the trailer, when someone
wonders aloud why the Rs 1000 note is pink in colour, Irrfan retorts: Because it is created from the blood and sweat of the common man. The censor board raised an objection to what they see as a derogatory reference to the Indian currency.
Rather than deleting the objectionable reference, the film's makers have gone with the trailer to the revising committee [appeals body].
|
5th September | | |
Zimbabwe resumes jamming of SW Radio Africa
| Based on article from
sokwanele.com
|
SW Radio Africa (SWRA) have done an incredible job ensuring news-deprived Zimbabweans still have access to impartial objective information despite the Zanu PF government's passing of repressive legislation. SWRA, broadcasting from outside Zimbabwe
on short wave, have managed to provide independent news to parts of the country that email and online news sources cannot reach. As such they have been a lifeline of information to oppressed Zimbabweans. It has also made SWRA a thorn in the side
for members of the political elite who feel most threatened by a critical and enquiring press that seeks to expose corruption and human rights abuses. SWRA have been jammed before, but their article on their website about this instance conveys
shock at the fact that, this time, the jamming is happening under the inclusive government which includes former opposition parties that have supposedly fought for democratic principles. Robert Mugabe's regime has resumed jamming news broadcasts
from SW Radio Africa. On Wednesday evening the first half hour of our broadcast featuring Newsreel was drowned out by a heavy noise, sounding like a slow playing record. In 2005 Mugabe's regime began jamming SW Radio Africa frequencies just before
the controversial Operation Murambatsvina. It was reported that the jamming equipment and expertise was provided by China and at the time we spoke to a soldier who says he was sent to China to be trained in jamming techniques. For the past few
weeks we have been concerned that jamming tests were being carried out on our broadcasts as various radio hams around the world have been sending us regular reports of a faintly audible music loop. Unfortunately it was confirmed that these were tests, as
jamming began in earnest on 1st September.
|
5th September | | |
Jordan backs off from most repressive parts of new cyber crime law
| Based on article from
cpj.org
|
Jordanian journalists succeeded this week in turning back some of the most repressive aspects of a new law on cyber crimes. The initial version of the law, approved by the cabinet of ministers on August 3, included broad restrictions on material
deemed by the state to be defamatory or to involve national security. It also allowed law enforcement officials to conduct warrantless searches of online outlets. Facing domestic protests and international pressure from CPJ and others, the cabinet
revised the measure on Sunday. The government said it had deleted one of the most contentious provisions, Article 8, which vaguely barred the sending or posting data or information via the Internet or any information system that involves defamation or
contempt or slander. Online journalists saw the article as an invitation to harass journalists who post critical articles. The cabinet also deleted a worrisome clause in Article 12 that banned spreading ideas affecting national security or
foreign relations of the Kingdom, as well as public safety or the national economy. The revised measure still imposes restrictions on national security reporting online, although it sets more precise boundaries: Websites may not publish data or information not available to the public, concerning national security or foreign relations of the kingdom, public safety or the national economy.
The cabinet backed off warrantless searches as well. Its revised version requires law enforcement officials to obtain a warrant from a public prosecutor or court in order to search an online outlet. It also requires police to provide evidence
of a crime. On Monday, the state-funded National Centre for Human Rights and the head of the Jordanian Bar Association welcomed changes to the law. Both groups had been critical of the initial version.
|
5th September | |
|
|
Police seizure of a journalist's photos from a demonstration See article from marcvallee.co.uk |
4th September | | |
Ohio law proposes criminalising webmasters so that ex-criminals can have their convictions hidden
| Based on article
from indexoncensorship.org
|
Six Ohio state senators have introduced a bill that would compel individuals media organizations to erase stories from the Internet about former convicts whose case records are sealed by the courts. The bill in question, Senate Bill 291, would
also penalize organizations to the tune of $250,000 - with a maximum fine of up to $1 million - for failing to delete the information and then knowingly publishing it on their websites. Under current Ohio law, first-time non-violent offenders are
able to get the courts to expunge their records. The bill being pushed by the senators would also extend that privilege to people convicted of multiple offenses. In order to be eligible to seek court approval, a convict would need to maintain a clean
record and the crime in question would need to be more than five years old. According to the Columbus Dispatch, the bill would require individuals and private businesses to erase the historical record by destroying records they hold
about the convictions of those whose cases are sealed. The relevant provision in the proposal reads: Whoever violates division (C)(2) of this section by knowingly releasing or otherwise disseminating or making available information over the
internet is guilty of releasing sealed records and shall be fined one million dollars. But critics have attacked the bill as posing a threat to freedom of speech. The Wheeling News-Register, wrote in an editorial that the bill simply was
unworkable. Here at the newspaper, for example, we have computerized records of criminal reports dating back more than five years. It would be very difficult to find and erase them all. Smith's bill clearly is unconstitutional. The First Amendment
guarantees freedom of speech, even when those guilty of old crimes would prefer their offenses be forgotten.
|
4th September | | |
Medal of Honor banned from US military base stores
| Based on article from
mercurynews.com
|
U.S. military base exchanges have decided to not carry the controversial Medal of Honor video game. I'm thrilled, said Karen Meredith, whose son, Lt. Ken Ballard, perished in 2004. She has set off a storm of protest against
Redwood City-based Electronic Arts and its first-person shooter game, which allows players to pretend they're Taliban fighters killing American soldiers in Afghanistan. She applauded Maj. Gen. Bruce Casella, commander of the Army and Air Force
Exchange Service for the decision to keep the game out of its stores worldwide. I've heard from people all over the world, many of them upset about this game, so at least this has started a conversation, she said. And this country needs
to have a conversation about the place of violent video games in our society, especially a game based on an ongoing war. Due out Oct. 12, Medal of Honor has drawn accolades from gamers and has been defended even by some U.S. soldiers.
|
4th September | | |
Man convicted for online story considered as harassment and stalking
| Based on article from
thescotsman.scotsman.com
|
A stalker was jailed after writing an online story about raping and murdering a woman he had been harassing in real life for two years. Greg Downing detailed the imagined attack on children's author Katharine Quarmby in an online novel. He
had bombarded Quarmby with phone calls and e-mails since they met through an online dating site in 2008. He was convicted of stalking her on three separate occasions before she found the blog online after typing her name into the internet search engine
Google. The 29-page piece, titled A Novel: Katharine Quarmby , is about a man stalking the writer, burgling her home, raping and finally murdering her. Judge Deva Pillay sentenced Downing to six months in jail. He said: This can
only be described as a campaign of harassment. It is clear that your harassment of Miss Quarmby has been deliberate and premeditated so as to cause her and her family the maximum discomfort, embarrassment and fear.
|
4th September | | |
Malaysian establishes internet censorship task force
| Based on article from
google.com
|
Malaysia has formed a task force to censor the Internet of blog postings deemed harmful to national unity. Home ministry deputy secretary general for security Abdul Rahim Mohamad Radzi said the unit would involve the police, Internet regulators,
the information ministry and the attorney general's chambers: It is a mechanism that will coordinate these various agencies to help monitor what is being said in cyberspace and to take action against those that are trying to stoke racial tensions and
disunity . Abdul Rahim said the group would also monitor alternative and mainstream media for similar content: There is a disturbing trend now appearing on the Internet where some people are inciting racial unrest and causing confusion and
this will damage the peace we have in the country Abdul Rahim cited the recent case of a Facebook page that insulted Muslim Malays. Police are also investigating ethnic Chinese rapper Wee Meng Chee for sedition, after he posted a three-minute
rap on YouTube criticising a Malay headmistress accused of making racial slurs against minority students. In another case, Malaysian journalist Irwan Abdul Rahman was charged this week over a satirical blog which made fun of the state power firm
Tenaga, and faces a year's jail if convicted. State media said that Irwan Abdul Rahman, a sub-editor with a Malay-language daily, pleaded not guilty in the Sessions Court to a charge of posting a fictitious comment. It said he was accused
of intent to hurt over the posting, entitled TNB to sue WWF over Earth Hour which jokingly said Tenaga would take action over the World Wildlife Fund's annual energy-saving initiative. Update: Discharged
24th March 2011. See article from cpj.org It
took almost a year, but the Petaling Jaya Sessions Court has dismissed the charges against Irwan Abdul Rahman, noting that there were no grounds for prosecution. As Rahman points out in his post on the case, having the case discharged does not
amount to an acquittal. Almost one year for Rahman to get out from under the pressure of a court case. Is that just Malaysian justice slowly grinding forward? Possibly. But it's also one year of intimidation for one blogger who dared to poke fun
at a powerful government-run institution. Lingering in the back of every Malaysian journalist's mind, the case was and remains chilling.
|
4th September | |
| A new euphemism for Twitter censors
| Based on article from
en.rsf.org
|
Chinese authorities have just announced that microblogging websites – sites offering Twitter-style services – will be told to appoint self-discipline commissioners to be responsible for censorship. In a parallel development, new rules took
effect on 1 September. Now anyone wanting to buy a mobile phone that uses prepaid SIM cards will have to produce identity papers while anyone already owning such a phone will have three years to register their ownership. China's censors are
giving themselves an additional layer of control, Reporters Without Borders said. The Great Firewall of China is getting human reinforcements to boost its effectiveness. But if they are held to strict performance criteria, it seems these
commissioners are being assigned an impossible mission, given the volume of information circulating online for which they will be responsible. The press freedom organisation added: Nonetheless, their very existence will be dangerous because
of their nuisance value and because they could encourage microbloggers to censor themselves. Meanwhile, under the pretext of combating spam, a new blow has been dealt to the personal data of China's mobile phone users. The microblogging
platforms will themselves have to hire the commissioners whose job it will be to monitor and censor anything that could threaten China's security and social stability. They are supposed to target content linked to illegal activities, pornography and
violence, as well as baseless rumours and politically sensitive issues. Although hired by the site, each commissioner will be responsible for its content and will be operationally independent.
|
4th September | | |
New US Blu-ray release of Shogun Assassin
| US 2010 AnimEigo Blu-ray
via UK Amazon and
at US Amazon UK 2009 Eureka Lone Wolf & Cub Boxset R2 DVD
at UK Amazon
|
Shogun Assassin is a 1980 Japanese/US action film by Robert Houston. See IMDb The BBFC passed the 1999 Horror Video 18 uncut. Previously, the 1992
Vipco was pre-cut along the lines of the cinema version. No further BBFC cuts were required
- The Vipco release is missing a short sequence early on just before the initial decapitation. In the US version, The Shogun lowers his head to reveal the baby wearing a circular mirror like a headlamp around his head (he is carrying the baby
piggy-back), the mirror blinds his enemy allowing the Shogun to whack his head off.
- Also the scene on the boat with the eye gouging is there in both versions, but is a second or so shorter in the Vipco release.
And before that Vipco released the video in the early 80's and it got caught up in the video nasties panic . Copies were seized and the distributors were prosecuted. But the prosecution
failed and the videos were returned. Shogun Assassin was never officially listed as a video nasty by the DPP. Review from
US Amazon : A great film
Shogun Assassin is a great film. Much "controversy" has arisen over the years regarding this film having been cobbled together from two other films in the Lone Wolf series. I think that what has been achieved is an extremely entertaining,
fast-paced piece of action. By eliminating non-essential story lines and including a voice over narration, the action moves at break neck speed. The amount of blood spilled is so over the top as to be cartoonish, which
only adds to the uniqueness of the movie. If you have never seen Shogun Assassin or have seen it a thousand times, buy this DVD, it is well worth it.
|
4th September | | |
BBC's HARDtalk cancels interview with embattled Malaysian blogger
| Based on
article from
timesofindia.indiatimes.com
|
The BBC has denied dropping controversial blogger Raja Petra Kamaruddin from its Hardtalk segment due to political pressure. Raja Petra Kamaruddin (popularly known as RPK) was originally scheduled for a Sept 1 interview with Hardtalk
. Malaysia Today had previously alleged that the BBC had cancelled RPK's interview because it would upset the Malaysian government and expose the station to legal action. The suggestion that the item was dropped due to political
pressure is untrue, said Peter Connors, BBC global news senior press officer in an e-mail statement. Citing editorial reasons , Connors told FMT that it was normal for certain news or current affairs stories not to be aired on the BBC's
channels. It became clear in our research that any comprehensive interview with RPK would prominently feature issues that are currently the subject of a current court case in Malaysia, Connors said. He also added that a meeting with
the controversial blogger would raise issues of defamation. Connors did not specify which court case he was referring to.
|
4th September | | |
censor cuts to famous names in docu-drama
| Based on
article from
timesofindia.indiatimes.com
|
Sangeeth Sivan's decision to turn producer a so-called realistic film on the October 2008 shootout on 332 bus, did not go down well with the Censor Board. Sivan's film 332 Mumbai To India , directed by Mahesh Pande has undergone several
editing sessions since members of the Censor Board watched it. Our source said, There were as many as 20 dialogue cuts in the film and although Sivan and his director Mahesh Pande fought hard for every cut, they finally had no option but to
beep or mute the names of many prominent people in the film. These included references to prominent people like Amitabh Bachchan, Ambani's, MS Dhoni, Sachin Tendulkar and Raj Thackeray. Though the above-mentioned names were
deleted Sivan and Pande apparently fought hard to retain the names of Dhoni and Tendular. The producer-director duo opted to mute Thackeray's name but they could not prevent the other cuts from happening. Sivan feels that the essence of the film
is now lost. When contacted, a distraught Sivan lamented: I only feel that there should be a particular guideline for everyone, a set rule, which we all are aware of: that we can't do this and that certain things will be objected to. Here, what
happens is that a few privileged ones get away with everything and that is much more controversial than the content of our film. When contacted Alpana Sharma, Regional Officer of the Censor Board said : Yes the cuts have been added as there
were famous names mentioned in the film in a derogatory manner.
|
3rd September | | |
Creating a buzz in the music world
| Based on article from
montrealgazette.com
|
Cee Lo's profanity-laced single, with a catchy Motown backing track and the blunt title F**k You , has become a phenomenon since its online release, driven in large part by YouTube views of the song's inventive video. Zano
Ludgood, a record shop manager at Criminal Records in Atlanta, Cee Lo's hometown, says viral videos act as advertisements for when the actual product goes on sale. People are excited now about Cee Lo, and if they like a song, even if they
download it, they'll still come out and buy the complete album, Ludgood says. People talk about record stores dying, but social media works with us, it's a great way to build buzz. The buzz on Cee Lo has been deafening, even if his new
song has a title unfit for a family newspaper. Soon after a celebrity release on MySpace, it had become a smash in the clubs. When the DJ dropped it, I was like, 'Cee Lo's got another one!' says Mizz Shyneka, an on-air personality at
Atlanta's HOT 107.9FM. Everybody was dancing, and the people that hadn't heard the record were all trying to listen. I wish they could hear it on the radio, but given the title, I don't think there's any way around that. MTV has reported
the track will be re-released as Forget You , The idea of leaking an explicit track and then re-releasing it for the radio isn't new. In 2006 Snoop Dogg made a song called I Wanna Love You that originally had a different chorus, with
the word love dropped in favour of a more explicit verb. The song went No. 1 on Billboard's singles chart.
|
3rd September | | |
Online flash game winds up the easily offended
| From gamepolitics.com
|
A simple online flash videogame backed by the right wing Austrian Freedom Party (FPO), launched in advance of regional elections to be held on September 26, depicts the province of Styria as overrun with mosques and tasks players with stopping further
ones from being built. A Reuters story claims that the Bye Bye Mosque game has already drawn over 60,000 visitors. Iin addition to criticisms from the local Islamic community, Social Democrats and the Green Party. A local Islamic
leader named Anas Schakfeh called the game tasteless and incomprehensible, adding, This is religious hatred and xenophobia beyond comparison. As the game ends, a message reads, Styria is full of minarets and mosques. So vote for
Dr. Gerhard Kurzmann (pictured) and the Freedom Party on September 26 so that this doesn't happen.
|
3rd September | | |
BlackBerry enables snooping for the Indian authorities
| 2nd September 2010. Based on article
from guardian.co.uk
|
The Indian government has lifted a threat to block certain BlackBerry communication services following moves by the technology firm Research in Motion that could allow the country's security authorities greater access to snoop on messages. Stepping back from the brink of a crackdown, India's ministry of home affairs said RIM had made
certain proposals for lawful access by law enforcement agencies and these would be operationalised immediately . It did not offer any detail on these concessions Following RIM's apparent concessions, the Indian government said today the
situation would be reviewed in 60 days' time. It added that the country's telecoms ministry was examining whether all the subcontinent's BlackBerry communications could be routed through a server physically located in India.
Update: Wider Issues 3rd September 2010. See article from
bbc.co.uk
India has toughened its scrutiny of telecoms firms with a directive demanding access to everything . An Indian Home Ministry official told the BBC that any company with a telecoms network should be accessible . It could be Google
or Skype, but anyone operating in India will have to provide data, he said. The move follows high-profile talks with Blackberry maker Research in Motion about ways to allow Indian security forces to monitor data. The government is also
likely to target virtual private networks, which give secure access to company networks for employees working away from their offices. Update: UN 3rd September
2010. Based on article from thescotsman.scotsman.com
The head of the UN's telecommunications agency is urging BlackBerry's manufacturer to allow foreign law enforcement agencies access to its customers' data. Hamadoun Toure says governments fighting terrorism have the right to demand access.
|
3rd September | | |
Bahrain detains 159 opposition activists and then bans the press from reporting this
| Based on article from
cpj.org
|
Bahrainian prosecutors have banned journalists from reporting on the detentions of dozens of opposition activists, according to news accounts. The Committee to Protect Journalists calls on authorities to lift the censorship order immediately. Authorities detained Shiite opposition activists in a series of arrests. The New York Times reported that as many as 159 people had been detained, and that later detainees included people not known as activists. The detainees include Abduljalil Alsingace, a blogger who has been critical of the government and who tracks human rights issues for the opposition Haq Movement for Civil Liberties and Democracy.
In a statement published Friday in all Bahraini newspapers, Al-Buainain banned print, radio, TV, Internet, and other media from publishing or broadcasting any news related to the case of Alsingace and the other detainees. The statement said
ongoing investigations require secrecy in order to uncover the truth and preserve public order. Violations are subject to penalties of one year in prison. The authorities in Bahrain cannot cite operational secrecy as pretext for barring
domestic coverage of a crackdown that has already been widely reported by the foreign media, said Robert Mahoney, deputy director of CPJ. The people of Bahrain have a right to know if their government is detaining scores of their fellow citizens
and the media have a duty to report it. This gag order must be lifted immediately. Update: Global Voices Advocacy author arrested 7th September 2010. See
article from advocacy.globalvoicesonline.org
Ali Abdulemam, a leading Bahraini blogger and Global Voices Advocacy author, was arrested earlier today by the Bahraini authorities for allegedly spreading false news on BahrainOnline.org portal, one of the most popular pro-democracy
outlets in Bahrain. The BahrainOnline portal is censored in Bahrain. He sent an email earlier mentioning that he got a call from the Bahraini national security just before his arrest, then arrested him and alleged that he was trying to flee.
|
3rd September | |
| Malawi president threatens a ban on newspapers reporting food shortages
| Based on article from
cpj.org
|
The Committee to Protect Journalists condemns threatening comments made by President Bingu wa Mutharika against Malawian news outlets last week. Mutharika threatened to close newspapers that report critically about his administration after the private
weeklies Malawi News and Weekend Nation cited a regional agency's report forecasting food shortages in the country. I will close down newspapers that lie and tarnish my government's image, the president said at an agricultural fair in
Blantyre. The president told editors to leave blank pages or else publish pictures of cows, hyenas, or dogs, if they have nothing positive to report, according to local reports. Instead of making threats and telling editors what to
print, the president should uphold his country's constitutional commitment to press freedom, said CPJ East Africa Consultant Tom Rhodes. The president should allow the press to report freely, especially on such vital matters as food supply.
Malawi News and Weekend Nation cited a food supply forecast by the Southern African Development Community (SADC), which said more than one million Malawians could face shortages in the wake of dry conditions in the south.
|
2nd September | | |
Lawsuit challenges Alaskan law that will ban adult material from the internet
| Based on article from gamepolitics.com
|
An Alaskan law that goes into effect on July 1, and deals with the electronic distribution of indecent material to minors, has come under fire by free speech advocates. Section 11.61.128 of the Alaska Statutes, signed into law by Governor Sean
Parnell in May, calls for parties to be criminally liable for media transmissions (or hosting) of material that is considered harmful to minors. Additionally, violators can face up to two years in prison, could be forced to forfeit their business
and would have to register as sex offenders. Those in opposition label the law as broad censorship, and claim that it bans from the Internet anything that may be 'harmful to minors,' including material adults have a First Amendment right
to view. Hostility to the law has resulted in a lawsuit attempting to block it, brought forth by groups like the Entertainment Merchants Association (EMA), the American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression, American Civil Liberties Union
of Alaska, the Freedom To Read Foundation and the Association of American Publishers. Citing the First and Fourteenth Amendments, in addition to the Constitution's Commerce Clause, the lawsuit seeks to have the law declared unconstitutional.
|
2nd September | |
|
|
The BBFC's cutting of A Serbian Film shows that we still aren't trusted to judge movies for ourselves. See article from spiked-online.com
|
2nd September | |
| Philippines president takes a hammering on Facebook
| Based on article from
mb.com.ph
|
A hostage drama in the Philippines on August 23, 2010 tested the patience and tolerance of the Philippine government, particularly newly installed President Benigno Noynoy Aquino III. The hostage crisis and the alleged mishandling of the
entire situation was seen by almost everyone which illicited various reactions. The question is, where will they air their grievances and disappointments? Where else but to use the world's most popular social networking site to date - Facebook. President Aquino created his Facebook page to promote transparency, but now angry netizens and President Aquino detractors are flooding the page with negative comments, strong language and insults.
And because of the barrage of negative posts, President Benigno Aquino or whoever is in-charge of this page censored his Facebook page after users ignored an appeal to stop bashing the Philippine government. His Facebook account is followed
by 1.9 million readers.
|
2nd September | | |
Zimbabwe bans art depicting 1980 atrocities
| Based on
article from voanews.com
|
The Zimbabwe Government has banned the works of prominent visual artist Owen Maseko depicting the Fifth Brigade atrocities of the 1980s in which an estimated 20 000 civillians, mostly supporters of the Zimbabwe African People's Union (ZAPU), were killed
by the army unit. The civilians were massacred in the Matableland and Midlands Provinces and Robert Mugabe's only apology was that it was a moment of madness. Maseko's works were banned under the Censorship and Entertainment Act. In
a government gazette, the government banned the showing of video clips with effigies, words and paintings on the walls of the National Art Gallery set up by Maseko. Meanwhile, Vote Thebe, the Director of the National Art Gallery and the sculptor
of a nude statue, Looking into the Future , is expected to appear in court on charges of allowing Maseko to hold the art exhibition without a licence. Thebe will also be charged under the Censorship and Entertainment Act for allegedly
keeping a nude statue at the gallery showing male genital organs. Looking into the Future was pulled down from Bulawayo's Tower Block gardens in the 1980s after the local authority was accused of aiding Thebe to mount an offensive piece of art in
public. Police closed Maseko's exhibition on March 26, showing President Mugabe and his crack army unit dripping with blood of cowed innocent civilians, 24 hours after it was mounted at the gallery. He was then arrested and granted bail a few days
after police closed a photography exhibition in Harare showing human rights violations by Mugabe's supporters.
|
1st September | | |
ASA to censor internet adverts from 1st March 2011
| Based on article from
bbc.co.uk
|
The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) is extending its remit to cover the online realm. It means that online marketing and ads will, from 1 March 2011, be subject to the same strict advertising rules as traditional media. The ASA will
also have the power to ban marketing statements on social networks such as Facebook and Twitter This is a massive step. Consumers don't differentiate between adverts on TV or online and this ensures that claims online will be subject to the
same strict scrutiny of those in traditional media, said an ASA spokesman. The new rules will apply to adverts and any statement on a website that is intended to sell products or services. Websites will be given until 1 March 2011 to comply
with the new rules. In an effort to protect online freedom of speech, the ASA's new remit will not extend to journalistic and editorial content related to causes and ideas. But direct requests for donations for fund-raising will be under its
jurisdiction. The ASA will also be given new sanctions against online ads found to be in breach of its regulations, including the removal of paid-for search advertising and the right to place its own advertisements highlighting an advertiser's
non-compliance.
|
1st September | |
| Manchester Council seeks a ban on Christian Voice anti-gay protesters
| Based on
article from menmedia.co.uk
|
Christian protesters who picketed the Manchester Pride parade could be banned from the streets during next year's event. Council chiefs are 'outraged' that around 20 placard-waving demonstrators – many from the conservative pressure group
Christian Voice – were allowed to disrupt the event. They gathered outside the John Rylands Library on Deansgate as more than 100 floats – celebrating Greater Manchester's gay, lesbian, bisexual and trangender communities – went past. Members of the protest were filmed shouting
sinful and wicked at people taking part in Saturday's parade. The group was largely drowned out by the whistle-blowing crowd of thousands – and Lord of the Rings actor Sir Ian McKellen gave them an ironic wave as he led the
procession. But town hall bosses believe the protesters overstepped the mark. They now plan to work with police to see whether anti-hate laws can be used to ban similar scenes at Pride next summer. Pat Karney, the council's city centre
spokesman, said such protests had no place in Manchester. He said: I will be meeting organisers and police to make sure that next year people are not subject to these vile, hate-filled rantings. This is 2010, not 1950, and young gay men and women
should not be subjected to this hatred. We have a proud history in Manchester of freedom of speech but there is no place for this. I am a Christian and I believe that these people are a terrible advert for Christianity. There are things we can do using
hate laws to make sure they do not come back. Stephen Green, national director of Christian Voice, said: It is a very sad day for this country when the authorities want to clamp down on the teachings of the Gospel. This is a major assault
on freedom of speech.
|
1st September | | |
Indonesia joins the anti-BlackBerry bandwagon
| Based on article
from independent.co.uk
|
The war in Indonesia over the available of pornography on mobile devices has resulted in Communication and Information Minister Tifatul Sembiring threatening to kick BlackBerry out of the country. He wants parent company Research in Motion (RiM) to agree
to block all porn from the devices. The minister has said that he had communicated to RiM his wishes, but has yet to receive a reply. If they are still not responding to our request, we have to close it down, Tifatul said, adding,
RIM may violates our law if it remains providing porn content in its service [in Indonesia]. Earlier this month, Titaful urged RiM to set up servers in the country. The servers were needed, he claimed, in order to perform wiretaps in crime
cases, bringing in non-tax revenue for the country and reducing service charges for customers. They would also make it much easier for the government to block porn locally.
|
1st September | | |
Facebook monitoring in Egypt
| Based on
article from
advocacy.globalvoicesonline.org
|
On 1st July, 2010, the Egyptian Ministry of Interior (MOI) has reportedly established a special department to monitor Facebook activities and content in Egypt according to the administrative decision 765. The main task of this group is to monitor
Facebook content like groups, pages and chat and to publish reports countering online criticism of current Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak or his son Gamal. There is team of 45 members in Egypt who are monitoring the activities of Egypt's 3.8
million Facebook users as well as the monitoring of e-mail . An anonymous security source mentioned to the Aljarida newspaper that Egyptian security authorities used to censor Facebook among other websites but the MOI paid special attention to
Facebook in 2008 after the first call for 6 April Strike that was organized on Facebook. The anonymous source mentioned to the newspaper that there are groups of paid young Egyptians from the National Democratic Party (NDP) youth, to defense the
NDP and the government. According to the same source they have already created 166 Facebook group in support of president's son Gamal Mubarak and 38 other groups supporting his father, resident Hosni Mubarak.
|
1st September | | |
|
US based TechDirt feel protected from British libel claim by newly enacted SPEECH act See article from techdirt.com |
|
|